RAJMATA KAVITESHWARI DEVI,SATNA vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER , SATNA
ITA 107/JAB/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur12 Mar 2026AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra
Section 144Section 147Section 254Section 264
capital gains, the addition made by the AO itself is bad in law and is liable to be quashed.
4. The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) (NAFC) was not Justified in holding that, the appellant did not cooperate in assessment proceedings merely on the ground that she did not respond to the notices issued by the Departmental Valuation Officer