Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26310 Section 143(3)4 Addition to Income3 Section 1472 Unexplained Investment2 Natural Justice2

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

investment was unexplained and since there was no proof that the shares that were transferred to demat account were the same shares that were purchased earlier, the additions made in this regard were justified. Furthermore, as the short term capital loss had been held to be bogus

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

SHRI SUBHASH KUMAR AAHI,SATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

SHRI SUBHASH KUMAR AAHI,SATNA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-SATNA, SATNA

M/S AMBAJEE JEWELLERS JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JABALPUR-1,, JABALPUR