Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 43(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 153A4 Section 1274 Addition to Income3 Section 1472 Section 127(2)2 Section 1322 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Unexplained Money2 Cash Deposit

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 120/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Neeraj Agarwal, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

1 Renu Anandani A.Y. 2012-13 4. The Learned CIT confirmed the addition of Rs 3,56,680/on account of online investment when there is no contrary evidence available with him that payment has been made for such investment.AO had considered market rate on the date of transfer to Demat account from physical form and considered it as unexplained investment

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR

RENU ANANDANI,JABALPUR vs. NFAC, NFAC, DELHI

SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL,JABALPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. SHRI GAURAV AGRAWAL, JABALPUR