ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-CHHINDWARA, CHHINDWARA vs. SHRI SHEVENDRA SINGH PARIHAR, BALAGHAT
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 91/JAB/2019[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2011-12
Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148
bogus purchase expenses.
2. The learned CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of Rs.84,65,420/- on account of difference in gross receipts.
3. Learned
CIT(A) erred in de4leting the addition of Rs.82,23,678/- on account of unexplained cash deposits.
Grounds of Cross Objection No.01/JAB/2020
“1. Considering the fact that in spite of repeated request
