BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Revision u/s 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai261Delhi183Jaipur135Kolkata123Karnataka104Bangalore52Chandigarh50Ahmedabad41Chennai38Rajkot36Indore31Pune26Surat22Hyderabad19Agra19Lucknow17Nagpur11Raipur9Amritsar6Jodhpur4Patna4Cuttack3Ranchi3Guwahati3Dehradun2Jabalpur2Visakhapatnam1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 153C5Section 153A(1)3Section 153C(1)2Section 142(1)2Section 143(3)2Cash Deposit2Revision u/s 2632

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 25/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A(1)Section 153CSection 153C(1)Section 153DSection 263Section 7(1)

revision. In fact, most of the cash transactions are with the said partnership firms, with the ‘cash gift’ from wife, Priyanka Sharma, at Rs.78.50 lacs, added in assessment. No wonder, then, that none of these queries translated into any adjustment to the assessee’s returned income in the post section 263 assessment order. Though a matter subsequent, with which

M/S AMBAJEE JEWELLERS JABALPUR,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX JABALPUR-1,, JABALPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 21/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur12 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatshri Nikhil Choudhary

For Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144Section 263Section 68

263 order viz that AO order was passed under section 144 and further erred in mentioning that assessee has produced partial purchase bills only during assessment proceeding 12. The revision order dated 19/01/2022 is bad in law for other reasons also hence may kindly be cancelled. 13. The assessee craves the leave to add or amend any ground of appeal