BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,928Delhi708Jaipur279Ahmedabad267Kolkata142Chennai141Pune125Karnataka105Surat95Hyderabad94Bangalore94Chandigarh76Indore67Rajkot55Raipur43Calcutta35Nagpur31Amritsar31Lucknow24Guwahati22Allahabad20Patna15Jodhpur12Agra10Cuttack10Visakhapatnam9Dehradun5Telangana5Ranchi4SC3Cochin3Jabalpur2Varanasi1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Panaji1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 153C5Section 2633Section 153A(1)3Section 142(1)3Section 153C(1)2Section 143(2)2Section 143(3)2Section 1472Cash Deposit2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE-CHHINDWARA, CHHINDWARA vs. SHRI SHEVENDRA SINGH PARIHAR, BALAGHAT

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 91/JAB/2019[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Jabalpur01 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

purchases shown in trading account are bogus and therefore, the same are added to the income of the assessee. It clearly indicates the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of his income and therefore penalty

SHRI NITIN SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 25/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A(1)Section 153CSection 153C(1)Section 153DSection 263Section 7(1)

penalty u/s. 271E, or not, i.e., through the banking channel; the transaction being regarded as not genuine. Why, one may ask, would any person give ‘loan’ to such a person, i.e., knowing fully well that the latter does not have the capacity to repay? And, besides, for purchase of a number of plots of land, as in the present case