BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 96clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,221Delhi1,197Bangalore535Chennai340Kolkata293Hyderabad187Indore163Ahmedabad146Karnataka132Chandigarh118Jaipur116Cochin77Pune73Raipur47Surat38Visakhapatnam33Cuttack30Rajkot28Lucknow24Nagpur18Agra17Ranchi17Jodhpur12Guwahati12Patna12Telangana11Amritsar5Panaji5Jabalpur3Kerala2Dehradun2Calcutta2Allahabad2SC2Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 12A5Section 143(2)3Section 133A2Addition to Income2TDS2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR vs. PARVINDAR SINGH, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and cross- objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 98/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs Parvinder Singh, Circle-2(1), 526, Madan Mahal, Jabalpur. Jabalpur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Asaps9672A C.O.No.-9/Jab/2023 (In Ita No.98/Jab/2023) (Assessment Year- 2011- 2012) Parvinder Singh, Vs Acit, 526, Madan Mahal, Circle-2(1), Jabalpur. Jabalpur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Asaps9672A Assessee By Shri Dhiraj Ghai, Ca Revenue By Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 20/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

Section 268ASection 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act,1961 without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not proved the deduction of TDS in r/o interest to M/s Hinduja Leyland Finance amounting to Rs. 3,36,000/- and to Indusind Bank Ltd.amounting to Rs. 2,98,794/-. (B) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case

INDIAN SOCIETY OF WEED SCIENCE,JABALPUR vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXCEMPTION), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 48/JAB/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: Na Indian Society Of Weed V. Commissioner Of Income Science Tax (Exemption) Icar-Dwr Campus, Bhopal Maharajpur, Adhartal, Jabalpur-482004. Pan:Aaaai7305R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Sapan Usrethe, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 12 02 2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 19 02 2026 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Shravan Kumar Meena, CIT(DR)
Section 12A

96,94,639/-, the assessee has shown conference expenses to the extent of Rs.51,99,366/- and after considering general expenses of Rs. 6,61,909/-, an amount of Rs. 38,33,363/- (nearly 40% of the total receipts) is treated as surplus (iii) AY 2024-25: Against total receipt of Rs.15,59,987/-, major expenses are booked for salary

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

In the result, on this ground, appeal of the Revenue as well as appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 133/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 292BSection 43C

96 ITD 344. (iii) The assessee by admitting undisclosed income during the survey u/s 133A, induced the Income Tax authorities for not carrying any further enquiry. In such circumstances, ratio of decision in the ITAT "F" Bench, Mumbai in the case of ACIT Vs. Expresso Investment reported in 008 SOT 0287 is clearly applicable. 2. The CIT(A) has erred