Search: TDS | BharatTax

57 results for “TDS”+ Section 56(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

TDS53 Exemption51 Addition to Income7 Section 43B6 Section 684 Section 234A4 Section 143(2)3 Section 143(3)3 Section 1443 Section 57

RAJENDRA SINGH BAGGA,DAMOH vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 187/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2017-18 Rajendra Singh Bagga, 15 43, Tandon Vs. National Faceless Assessment Bagicha, College Road, Gayatri Nagar, Centre, Delhi [Jurisdiction Damoh, M.P. Officer-Acit Katni-Circle, Katni Pan:Adgpb8418G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, Fca Revenue By: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.06.2025 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Learned Cit(A), Nfac Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act Dated 14.10.2024 Whereby Learned Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Filed Against The Orders Of The Learned Ao Under Section 147 Read With Section 144 Dated 30.03.2022. The Grounds Of Appeal Are Under:- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Passing Ex- Party Order Without Providing Adequate Opportunity As Only Three Dates For Hearing Were Fixed & That Too In The Peak Periods Of Filling Of Tax Audits, Income Tax Returns & Accordingly Assessee Was Busy In Filling His Audit Report /Itr & Had Seeked Adjournment Also In This Regard. 2. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, Cit (A) Erred In Confirming Addition Of 6 Lacs Under Section 68, When Ao Himself Admitting In The Assessment Order That The Difference Of 5% 'Was Applicable As Allowable Difference Between Circle Rate & Actual Rate Of Purchase Of Property. Hence Forth The Addition Of Rs 6 Lacs Should Have Been Deleted By Ao.

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR

Section 144

Showing 1–20 of 57 · Page 1 of 3

RAJENDRA SINGH BAGGA,DAMOH vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

RAJENDRA SINGH BAGGA,DAMOH vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

SANJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL ,SATNA vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX CIRCLE, SATNA

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5) vs. SHRI SURESH KUMAR UPADHYAY & SONS, JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA vs. SHRI ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA, SATNA

DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI VISHWNATH DUBEY, PROP. M/S. PHOENIX PAULTRY, , JABALPUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL AGRAWAL (HUF), JABALPUR

ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SAGAR vs. SHRI MUKESH KUMAR JAIN,, SAGAR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) vs. J.P. TOBACCO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. PATHARIA PHATAK,

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATNA vs. SHRI SHASHI BHUSHAN BHATTACHARYA (HUF), SATNA

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SATNA vs. SHRI BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA (HUF), SATNA

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, REWA vs. SHRI RAMAYAN PRASAD DUBEY, REWA

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5), JABALPUR vs. M/S. SURESH KUMAR UPADHYAY AND SONS (HUF), JABALPUR

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA, SATNA vs. SHRI ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA, SATNA