Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 54clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,742 Mumbai1,560 Bangalore733 Chennai479 Kolkata346 Hyderabad213 Ahmedabad208 Pune193 Indore180 Cochin170 Karnataka157 Chandigarh153 Raipur143 Jaipur142 Visakhapatnam65 Nagpur53 Lucknow52 Cuttack44 Surat43 Rajkot37 Dehradun34 Ranchi34 Agra24 Amritsar22 Jodhpur21 Panaji15 Allahabad14 Patna13 Telangana13 Guwahati12 SC7 Kerala6 Jabalpur5 Varanasi5 Uttarakhand2 Calcutta1 Punjab & Haryana1 Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 234E5 Section 200A4 Section 143(2)3 TDS3 Addition to Income3 Section 43B2 Section 133A2 Section 2632 Section 143(3)2 Disallowance

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR

Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

2

54,200/- for delay in filling the quarterly TDS statement. Further the ITA Nos. 4,5,6,7 &23/Jab/2023 Administrative Officer Customs & Central Excise, Jabalpur assessee has filed rectification petition u/sec154 of the Act and was rejected vide order dated 3.11.2020. 5. Aggrieved by the rectification order, the assessee has filed an appeal before the CIT(A), whereas

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)

Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

TDS. 11. Before us the ld. DR supported the order of the Assessing Officer and the ld. AR relied the order of the ld. CIT(A). 12. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5 CO No. 05/ JAB/2020 Gajraj Mining P Ltd. 13. Section 43B of the Act which is as under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

In the result, on this ground, appeal of the Revenue as well as appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 133/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR

Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 292BSection 43C

section 133A of the IT Act 1961 in the instant year, books were examined, stocks were valued with coordination of the assessee 4 Co No. 09/JAB/2018 Chetanaya Promoter & Developers and some discrepancies were noticed. Statement recorded during survey proceedings dated 18.10.2014 and bifurcation of the surrender amount is as follows:- S.No Question no Particulars Amount 1 8 Undisclosed cash Rs.895000

SWETA GOENKA,JABALPUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMR TAX-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is dismissed

ITA 44/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur17 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra, CIT-DR

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 23/12/2019 is erroneous in-so-far as it is prejudicial to the interest of Revenue. Accordingly, the said order is SET ASIDE, with the direction to the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh Assessment Order. The A.O. is further directed to pass a suitable order by making proper investigation

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 79/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2018-19

For Appellant: \nShri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: \nShri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

TDS\nhad been deducted on payment. In case of labour charges there are very\nfew instances where receiver signature were not found due-to the reason\nthat the amount was collected by the mukaddam i.e. head of the group of\nlabourer same 'were explained to the AO but he had not accepted and\nmade the adhoc disallowance against the order