BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

58 results for “TDS”+ Section 50clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,287Delhi2,270Bangalore1,005Chennai696Kolkata581Ahmedabad509Hyderabad476Chandigarh328Jaipur275Indore259Pune242Cochin221Raipur188Karnataka155Surat124Visakhapatnam117Cuttack103Rajkot87Lucknow80Nagpur58Jabalpur58Ranchi43Jodhpur43Amritsar39Guwahati38Patna32Allahabad27Dehradun24Agra20Telangana20Panaji11SC8Kerala5Varanasi5Uttarakhand3Calcutta3Rajasthan1Orissa1J&K1Punjab & Haryana1Bombay1

Key Topics

TDS54Exemption50Section 43B8Addition to Income7Section 406Section 143(2)5Section 44A5Section 143(3)4Section 271B4Section 234A

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

50,47,450/- under the head, ‘material expenses’, Rs.3,30,45,840/- under the head, ‘labour payment’, Rs.3,30,458/- under the head, ‘labour welfare expenses’ and Rs.40,52,840/- under the head, ‘repair and maintenance’. He asked the assessee to substantiate these payments, but in the absence of response, he held that the same were unverifiable. Accordingly, he made

Showing 1–20 of 58 · Page 1 of 3

4
Disallowance4
Section 40A(3)3

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1 vs. M/S RPJ MINERALS PRIVATE LTD., SATNA

ITA 154/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 43B

TDS of Rs. 50,0000/- have been deposited before the due date of the filing of the return, he gave relief for the same and added back an amount of Rs. 24,91,229/- under section

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

TDS was required to be deducted under I.T.A. No.104/Jab/2018 C.O.No.03/Jab/2018 12 Assessment Year:2014-15 section 194J on the payment of Rs. 29,500/- made to 3 different parties. Hence, the assessee gets the relief of Rs.29,500/-. (ii) As regard the payment of Rs. 50

M/S RPJ MINERALS PVT. LTD ,MAIHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1,SATNA, SATNA

ITA 86/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur19 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Kul Bharat & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Shrawan Kumar Meena, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 43B

TDS of Rs. 10 ITA No.154/JAB/2016 ITA No.86/JAB/2022 A.Ys. 2012-13 & 2017-18 M/s RPJ Minerals Pvt. Ltd. 50,0000/- have been deposited before the due date of the filing of the return, he gave relief for the same and added back an amount of Rs. 24,91,229/- under section

RUCHI MAHILA MANDAL,CHHATARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CHHATARPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 194/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 139DSection 147Section 148(1)Section 194CSection 271BSection 44A

TDS 1 | P a g e ITA No.194/JAB/20198 (A.Y. 2010-11) Ruchi Mahila Mandal vs. ITO was deducted by the contractor/supplier under section 194C of the Act and as per 26AS data a system generated notice was issued to the assessee-appellant on 14-03-2015 and 12-08-2015 for filing the return. The assessee-appellant did not file

SANJAY KALE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1,

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 234/JAB/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur16 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad""./ Ita No. 234/Jab/2015 "" " " " " " "  / Assessment Year : 2008-09   Sanjay Kale, Income Tax Officer-1, Vishnu Nagar, Parasia Road, Vs Chhindwara (Mp) Chhindwara (Mp) Pan : Amcpk 1268 L / (Appellant) / (Respondent)         Assessee By : Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. Adv. Revenue By : Shri P.D. Chougule, Dr $ %&'/Date Of Hearing : 14/03/2018 ! "# $ %&' /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2018 ()*+ "# .//O R D E R , - Per Manish Borad:- This Appeal Of Assessee For Assessment Year 2008-09 Is Directed Against The Order Of The Cit(A)-I, Jabalpur Dated 22.09.2015 Vide Appeal No.J/Cit/A/I/Jbp/Ito/W/I/Cwa/203/10-11, Arising Out Of Order Under Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”), Framed On 24.12.2010 By The Ito-1, Chhindwara.

For Appellant: Shri G.N. Purohit, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri P.D. Chougule, DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 251(4)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 44A

TDS. Further, the assessee, in order to conduct the business more expeditiously, entered into a sub-contract with Mr. Kamal Kumar Aheliya, thereby agreeing to share 50% commission. It has further contended that the gross receipts during the year was much below than the prescribed limit of gross turnover required for the purpose of application of provisions of Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

50,80,623/- and business promotion expenses of Rs. 2,82,229/-. The entire expense were to the tune of Rs. 2,05,82,834/-. Therefore, the AO on ad-hoc basis disallowed sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- and added back to the income of the appellant holding that these expenses are not verifiable. The ld. CIT(A) restricted

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. CHETANAYA PROMOTERS AND DEVLOPERS,, JABALPUR

In the result, on this ground, appeal of the Revenue as well as appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed

ITA 133/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Garima Chaudhary, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 143(2)Section 292BSection 43C

section 133A of the IT Act 1961 in the instant year, books were examined, stocks were valued with coordination of the assessee 4 Co No. 09/JAB/2018 Chetanaya Promoter & Developers and some discrepancies were noticed. Statement recorded during survey proceedings dated 18.10.2014 and bifurcation of the surrender amount is as follows:- S.No Question no Particulars Amount 1 8 Undisclosed cash Rs.895000

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1) , JABALPUR vs. SHRI VISHWNATH DUBEY, PROP. M/S. PHOENIX PAULTRY, , JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 44/JAB/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, REWA vs. SHRI RAMAYAN PRASAD DUBEY, REWA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 31/JAB/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

DY. COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS) vs. J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 152/JAB/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JABALPUR vs. SHRI VIMAL AGRAWAL (HUF), JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 41/JAB/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION) vs. ST. MICHALE'S SOCIETY,

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 29/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

ASSISTANCE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SAGAR vs. SHRI MUKESH KUMAR JAIN,, SAGAR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 46/JAB/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE- SATNA, SATNA vs. SHRI ANURAG SHRIVASTAVA, SATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 222/JAB/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(5) vs. SHRI SURESH KUMAR UPADHYAY & SONS, JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 236/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. M/S SAGAR STONE INDUSTRIES, JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 212/JAB/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR vs. MADHYA PRADESH POWER GENERATING CO. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 198/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 112/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1), JABALPUR vs. M/S KEMTANI PROJECTS PVT. LTD., JABALPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue and Cross Objections by the assessees stand dismissed

ITA 110/JAB/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur23 Aug 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Sanjay Arora

TDS), Pathariya Phatak, Damoh Srivastava, Bhopal PAN No. JBPJ00523F Advocate 10 IT(SS) A Shri Arun Kumar Tiwari, Assistant No.5/Jab/05 01/04/88 Prop. Kachnar Builder,257, Commissioner of Shri M.M.Nema, to Wright Town, Jabalpur Income Tax, Circle Adv. 09/10/98 PAN No. A-953/Old PAN 1(1), Jabalpur 18-516/1994 IT(SS) A No.44/Jab/2013 and 95 other appeals Cos Page