BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi126Mumbai118Bangalore112Chandigarh51Jaipur31Kolkata29Ahmedabad28Chennai26Indore14Hyderabad9Karnataka8Dehradun8Visakhapatnam7Lucknow7Pune5Varanasi4Jabalpur4Rajkot1SC1Guwahati1Cochin1Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1

Key Topics

Section 2019Section 201(1)6Section 194C3Section 194J3Deduction3TDS3Addition to Income3Section 2632Section 452Section 48

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 16/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

2
ITA 15/JAB/2016[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
29 Sept 2021
AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 17/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

SHRI VISHAL SETHI,RAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(3), JABALPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 57/JAB/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Sept 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Nrs Ganesan & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 45Section 48Section 50C

482 001 [PAN: ARUPS 0489G] (Appellant ) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri R.B. Doshi, FCA Respondent by Shri Abhay Kr. Singh, CIT-DR Date of hearing 14/08/2020 Date of pronouncement 07/09/2020 ORDER Per Sanjay Arora, AM: This is an Appeal by the Assessee agitating the Order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) dated