BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “TDS”+ Section 36(1)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,650Delhi1,573Bangalore780Chennai552Kolkata360Ahmedabad208Hyderabad196Chandigarh182Karnataka154Cochin146Jaipur145Indore103Pune100Raipur95Visakhapatnam62Surat52Lucknow51Rajkot47Cuttack41Guwahati28Jabalpur26Nagpur26Agra22Amritsar21Telangana14Jodhpur12Varanasi11Dehradun10SC10Patna8Panaji7Ranchi7Himachal Pradesh6Kerala5Rajasthan5Allahabad4Uttarakhand2J&K1

Key Topics

TDS25Section 40A(3)3Addition to Income3Section 43B2Disallowance2

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

TDS. 11. Before us the ld. DR supported the order of the Assessing Officer and the ld. AR relied the order of the ld. CIT(A). 12. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5 CO No. 05/ JAB/2020 Gajraj Mining P Ltd. 13. Section 43B of the Act which is as under

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,TENDUKHEDA BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 77/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,BUXWAHA BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 75/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,MANDI ROAD NOWGONG BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 76/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAJHOLI BRANCH,MAJHOLI vs. CITO-TDS-2 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 55/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK NEGUAN BRANCH,NEGUWAN SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 56/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, ORCHHA BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 57/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, RAJAPUR BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS) JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 58/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , NIWADI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 59/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MOHANGARH BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 60/JAB/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, CHANDERA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 61/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , LARON BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 62/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MANDI BAMORA BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 63/JAB/2022[F.Y- 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAHEWA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 64/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, RANIBAUG PANNA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 65/JAB/2022[F.Y- 2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK,SALEHA BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 66/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK,LAUNDI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 67/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,CHHATARPUR BRANCH, SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 68/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,TATTAM BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 69/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,MAHARAJPUR BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 70/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012