KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI
In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40
234D of the I.T. Act, 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. The same deserves to be modified according to law.
10. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or modify any grounds of appeal at the time of hearing.”
2. It is seen that the appeal is delayed by about nine months. It has been submitted that
