BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 226(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi350Mumbai294Chennai188Karnataka168Bangalore132Kolkata94Raipur88Ahmedabad60Jaipur59Pune56Hyderabad52Dehradun31Indore30Chandigarh28Jodhpur23Cuttack16Cochin14Rajkot14Lucknow13Visakhapatnam10Amritsar9Nagpur8Surat6Jabalpur6Guwahati6Panaji5Patna4Kerala3SC3Agra2Telangana2Allahabad2Ranchi1Orissa1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 20112Section 201(1)6Deduction6TDS6Addition to Income6Section 1973Section 194C3Section 194J3

M.P. STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 24/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr.DR
Section 197Section 201

sections 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟, hereinafter) in it‟s case for three consecutive years, being assessment years (AYs). 2010-11 to 2012-13, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur („CIT(A)‟ for short) vide again a consolidated order dated 16/11/2015. The appeals raising the same issues, per identically worded

M.P. STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 22/JAB/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr.DR
Section 197Section 201

sections 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟, hereinafter) in it‟s case for three consecutive years, being assessment years (AYs). 2010-11 to 2012-13, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur („CIT(A)‟ for short) vide again a consolidated order dated 16/11/2015. The appeals raising the same issues, per identically worded

M.P. STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(TDS)-1,

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 23/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur08 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Srivastava, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Ravi Mehrotra, Sr.DR
Section 197Section 201

sections 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟, hereinafter) in it‟s case for three consecutive years, being assessment years (AYs). 2010-11 to 2012-13, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur („CIT(A)‟ for short) vide again a consolidated order dated 16/11/2015. The appeals raising the same issues, per identically worded

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 16/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 15/JAB/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 17/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments