BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 221clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi282Mumbai273Bangalore176Chennai118Karnataka90Kolkata78Ahmedabad72Hyderabad40Raipur35Jaipur33Cochin29Pune23Chandigarh13Rajkot13Jodhpur10Lucknow10Surat8Guwahati6Amritsar6Visakhapatnam5Indore5SC5Cuttack4Varanasi4Nagpur3Agra3Kerala3Ranchi2Allahabad2Telangana2Dehradun2Jabalpur2Patna1

Key Topics

Section 1476Section 1944Section 1434Section 143(3)2Section 402TDS2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

MOHAN LAL BHIKHULAL,BETUL GANJ, BETUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BETUL

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 73/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Bharat Sheogankar, Sr. CIT(DR)
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194Section 40

221,222 and 231/Jbp/2015 by order dt 27-04-2018 ITA Nos.73 & 78/LKW/2023 Page 2 of 4 assessee held interest payments as fair and allowable to the extent of 18%. G. 5 The CIT (Appeals) was also not justified in deciding the appeal without examining the issues. G. 6 The appellant craves for leave to amend, add to or omit

MOHAN LAL BHIKHULAL BETULGANJ ,BETUL,BETUAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BETUL WARD, BATUL

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 78/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Abhijeet Shrivastava, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Bharat Sheogankar, Sr. CIT(DR)
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 147Section 194Section 40

221,222 and 231/Jbp/2015 by order dt 27-04-2018 ITA Nos.73 & 78/LKW/2023 Page 2 of 4 assessee held interest payments as fair and allowable to the extent of 18%. G. 5 The CIT (Appeals) was also not justified in deciding the appeal without examining the issues. G. 6 The appellant craves for leave to amend, add to or omit