BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 200(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi899Mumbai825Bangalore784Patna476Pune464Chennai403Indore168Hyderabad151Kolkata141Karnataka119Jaipur116Raipur106Ahmedabad95Nagpur82Cochin69Chandigarh55Lucknow37Agra32Rajkot27Dehradun25Visakhapatnam18Ranchi18Amritsar15Panaji14Jodhpur13Surat13Guwahati9SC5Allahabad3Cuttack3Jabalpur3Telangana2Orissa1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 1547Section 143(1)5Section 234E5Section 200A4Section 40A(3)3TDS3Section 2452Rectification u/s 1542

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

section 194J on the payment of Rs. 29,500/- made to 3 different parties. Hence, the assessee gets the relief of Rs.29,500/-. (ii) As regard the payment of Rs. 50,000/- made to Shri V Ravindra Prasad Advocate, the assessee submitted that V. Ravendra Prasad is a regular assessee of income and has included the payment received from

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR
Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

Section 200A(1)(c), (d) & (f) of the Act and those provisionscame into force only from 01.06.2015 and therefore the authority issuing intimation U/s 200(3) of the Act, could not levy fee u/s 234E of the Act in respect of statement of TDS

RAMESH PRASAD YADAV,KHURAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BINA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadaleramesh Prasad Yadav, Vs Cpc, Bangalore 01, Sharma Ward, Khurai, Ito, Bina. Madhya Pradesh-470117. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No.Aafpy2747R Assessee By Shri H.S.Modh, Adv. Revenue By Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 18/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 245Section 3Section 7

200 DTR 417/ 320 CTR 456 (Bom.) has taken the view that, six months should reckon from the date, when assessee got knowledge of order. The wording of section 154(7) is pari-materia to section 154(7) of the Act which reads as “no amendment under the section shall be made after expiry of four year from