Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 200clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi896 Mumbai808 Bangalore783 Patna476 Pune464 Chennai400 Hyderabad151 Kolkata137 Karnataka119 Jaipur116 Raipur106 Ahmedabad95 Nagpur82 Cochin69 Indore61 Chandigarh55 Lucknow37 Agra32 Rajkot27 Dehradun25 Ranchi19 Visakhapatnam18 Amritsar15 Panaji14 Surat13 Jodhpur13 Guwahati9 SC5 Allahabad3 Jabalpur3 Cuttack3 Telangana2 Calcutta1 Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 1547 Section 143(1)5 Section 234E5 Section 200A4 Section 40A(3)3 TDS3 Section 2452 Rectification u/s 1542

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR

Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

Section 200A(1)(c), (d) & (f) of the Act and those provisionscame into force only from 01.06.2015 and therefore the authority issuing intimation U/s 200(3) of the Act, could not levy fee u/s 234E of the Act in respect of statement of TDS

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

section 194J on the payment of Rs. 29,500/- made to 3 different parties. Hence, the assessee gets the relief of Rs.29,500/-. (ii) As regard the payment of Rs. 50,000/- made to Shri V Ravindra Prasad Advocate, the assessee submitted that V. Ravendra Prasad is a regular assessee of income and has included the payment received from

RAMESH PRASAD YADAV,KHURAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , BINA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 34/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadaleramesh Prasad Yadav, Vs Cpc, Bangalore 01, Sharma Ward, Khurai, Ito, Bina. Madhya Pradesh-470117. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No.Aafpy2747R Assessee By Shri H.S.Modh, Adv. Revenue By Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 18/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

Section 143(1)Section 154Section 245Section 3Section 7

200 DTR 417/ 320 CTR 456 (Bom.) has taken the view that, six months should reckon from the date, when assessee got knowledge of order. The wording of section 154(7) is pari-materia to section 154(7) of the Act which reads as “no amendment under the section shall be made after expiry of four year from