BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai634Delhi406Bangalore251Kolkata200Chennai165Ahmedabad56Karnataka56Hyderabad48Chandigarh37Cochin35Jaipur35Pune28Cuttack24Dehradun20Indore19Visakhapatnam16Rajkot15Jabalpur13Telangana11Amritsar11Nagpur11Raipur10Panaji10Surat8Patna8Agra5Calcutta4Lucknow4Jodhpur4Allahabad4SC3Varanasi2Guwahati1Orissa1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 271C20Section 27120Section 201(1)17Section 194J12TDS12Section 194C10Deduction10Section 2019Addition to Income9Section 194E

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 230/JAB/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 192Section 193Section 194Section 194ASection 194BSection 194CSection 194DSection 194ESection 194FSection 194G

194J, i.e., the sections I.T.A. No.229/JAB/2015 I.T.A. No. 230/Jab/2015 4 under which the payments subject to tax deduction at source fell in the instant case, by 31/5/2008 and 31/5/2009 for credits on 31/3/2008 and 31/3/2009 respectively. The deposit of tax deducted at source for both the years under reference as per Annexure-A supra and, thus, admittedly,is on 28th

8
Section 194A6
Penalty5

J.P TOBACO PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 229/JAB/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur10 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 192Section 193Section 194Section 194ASection 194BSection 194CSection 194DSection 194ESection 194FSection 194G

194J, i.e., the sections I.T.A. No.229/JAB/2015 I.T.A. No. 230/Jab/2015 4 under which the payments subject to tax deduction at source fell in the instant case, by 31/5/2008 and 31/5/2009 for credits on 31/3/2008 and 31/3/2009 respectively. The deposit of tax deducted at source for both the years under reference as per Annexure-A supra and, thus, admittedly,is on 28th

CHIEF MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICE ANNUPPUR,ANNUPPUR vs. ITO-TDS-2,JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 84/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleita No. 84, 85, 86, 87, 88 & 89/Jab/2023 (A.Y: 2014-15 To 2019-20) Chief Medical & Vs. Ito, Tds-2, Health Office, Room No. 102, Aayakar Amarkant Road, Bhawan, Napier Town, Annuppur-484224, Jabalpur-482001, Madhya Pradesh. Madhya Pradesh.

For Appellant: Shri.Sapan Usrethe. Adv.ARFor Respondent: Shri.SaadKidwai. CIT -DR
Section 194JSection 201(1)

section 194J of the IT Act and therefore appellant is not liable to deduct TDS on such payment as these

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JAB/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

TDS) has worked out the liability of the assessee under section 194A, 194C, 194J and 1941 of the Act. All these

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

TDS) has worked out the liability of the assessee under section 194A, 194C, 194J and 1941 of the Act. All these

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 101/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

TDS) has worked out the liability of the assessee under section 194A, 194C, 194J and 1941 of the Act. All these

MANESSH SHARMA ,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

TDS) has worked out the liability of the assessee under section 194A, 194C, 194J and 1941 of the Act. All these

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

TDS) has worked out the liability of the assessee under section 194A, 194C, 194J and 1941 of the Act. All these

SWETA GOENKA,JABALPUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMR TAX-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is dismissed

ITA 44/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur17 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

194J of the Act comes to Rs.25,73,938/- {Rs.6,40,506/- (+) Rs.19,33,432-}. Accordingly, the questioned sum of Rs.25,73,938/- remains to be taxed in the hands of the assessee and deserves to be added back to the total assessed income of the assessee for the year under consideration. 9. In the light of the aforesaid facts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), JABALPUR vs. ANAND MINING CORPORATION, JABALPUR

In the result, the Cross Objection of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 104/JAB/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur24 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 40A(3)

194J of the Act on payment of Rs.79,500/-. Accordingly, the professional fees of Rs.79,500/- paid without deducting the TDS has been disallowed under the provision of section

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 16/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 15/JAB/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 17/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments