BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “TDS”+ Section 194C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai700Delhi646Kolkata440Bangalore297Chennai189Jaipur85Hyderabad84Ahmedabad78Indore52Karnataka50Raipur45Rajkot30Pune27Amritsar25Cochin25Nagpur24Jodhpur23Chandigarh21Patna19Surat19Panaji18Visakhapatnam14Allahabad14Jabalpur14Cuttack12Guwahati12Ranchi10Lucknow9Kerala8Telangana7SC5Agra5Dehradun4Varanasi3Rajasthan2Calcutta2Gauhati1Orissa1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)24Section 271C20Section 27120Section 25012TDS11Section 2019Deduction9Addition to Income9Penalty7Section 194C

SAURABH SINGHAI L/H LATE SHRI MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN,SAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-3 SAGAR, SAGAR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is dismissed

ITA 5/JAB/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble & Sh. Manomohan Das, Hon‟Ble

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148(1)Section 263

TDS on freight of Rs. 1,26,59,566/- was not deducted while paying or crediting the sum to M/s. Sagar Road Lines. It has been submitted that as per the provisions section 194C

MANESSH SHARMA ,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

6
Section 143(3)4
Section 271B4
ITA 103/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

1)/201(1A) on 15.12.2015 for the reason that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS in the financial year 2009-10 and also for the reason that ITO(TDS), Jabalpur-II has not worked out quarter wise TDS liability. (ii) Smt Dr. Sunanda Dawar Sharma, the wife of the assessee, was not keeping good health

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

1)/201(1A) on 15.12.2015 for the reason that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS in the financial year 2009-10 and also for the reason that ITO(TDS), Jabalpur-II has not worked out quarter wise TDS liability. (ii) Smt Dr. Sunanda Dawar Sharma, the wife of the assessee, was not keeping good health

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 101/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

1)/201(1A) on 15.12.2015 for the reason that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS in the financial year 2009-10 and also for the reason that ITO(TDS), Jabalpur-II has not worked out quarter wise TDS liability. (ii) Smt Dr. Sunanda Dawar Sharma, the wife of the assessee, was not keeping good health

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JAB/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

1)/201(1A) on 15.12.2015 for the reason that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS in the financial year 2009-10 and also for the reason that ITO(TDS), Jabalpur-II has not worked out quarter wise TDS liability. (ii) Smt Dr. Sunanda Dawar Sharma, the wife of the assessee, was not keeping good health

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

1)/201(1A) on 15.12.2015 for the reason that the assessee is not liable to deduct TDS in the financial year 2009-10 and also for the reason that ITO(TDS), Jabalpur-II has not worked out quarter wise TDS liability. (ii) Smt Dr. Sunanda Dawar Sharma, the wife of the assessee, was not keeping good health

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,WRIGHT TOWN vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 89/JAB/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 250

1) of the Act, as the assessee had not made any payment on which liability of TDS arose. It was further submitted that since the assessee had not received the notices, it could not make submissions in support of such assertions before the ld. AO or the ld. CIT(A). It was, therefore, submitted that the TDS default

JAGANNATH DAS PREMVATI WELFARE SOCIETY,JABALPUR vs. ITO TDS-1, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Kumar Gupta, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. N.M. Prasad, Sr. DR
Section 201(1)Section 250

1) of the Act, as the assessee had not made any payment on which liability of TDS arose. It was further submitted that since the assessee had not received the notices, it could not make submissions in support of such assertions before the ld. AO or the ld. CIT(A). It was, therefore, submitted that the TDS default

KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ,REWA vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, KATNI

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 204/JAB/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 194CSection 234BSection 234DSection 250Section 270ASection 271ASection 40

TDS provisions under section 194C. Therefore, he made 30% amounting to Rs. 48,13,449/- disallowance of the said 3 A.Y. 2017-18 Krishna Construction Company expenses under section 40a(ia) of the Income Tax Act and initiated penalty proceedings under section 270A. The ld. AO also noted that the assessee had shown receipt of Rs.20,38,532/- from Executive

SWETA GOENKA,JABALPUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOMR TAX-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeal is dismissed

ITA 44/JAB/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur17 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Sapan Usrethe, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri U.B. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 263

194C & 194J of the Act comes to Rs.25,73,938/- {Rs.6,40,506/- (+) Rs.19,33,432-}. Accordingly, the questioned sum of Rs.25,73,938/- remains to be taxed in the hands of the assessee and deserves to be added back to the total assessed income of the assessee for the year under consideration. 9. In the light of the aforesaid

RUCHI MAHILA MANDAL,CHHATARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CHHATARPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 194/JAB/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur07 Apr 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon’Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Dhiraj Ghai, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 139DSection 147Section 148(1)Section 194CSection 271BSection 44A

TDS 1 | P a g e ITA No.194/JAB/20198 (A.Y. 2010-11) Ruchi Mahila Mandal vs. ITO was deducted by the contractor/supplier under section 194C

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 15/JAB/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 17/JAB/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments

M/S DIAMOND CEMENT vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

In the result, the assessee’s appeals are allowed on the aforesaid terms

ITA 16/JAB/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur29 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora, Hon'Ble

Section 194CSection 194JSection 201Section 201(1)

section 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Years (AYs.) 2010-11 to 2012-13 vide, again, a common order dated 07/6/2013. 2. The common issue in these appeals, for each of the three years under reference, is the correct rate at which tax at source on the payments