BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 151clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi478Mumbai464Bangalore165Chandigarh133Chennai129Karnataka101Hyderabad100Ahmedabad76Jaipur75Cochin59Raipur48Pune44Kolkata40Indore31Nagpur25Surat22Lucknow17Agra16Cuttack13Amritsar12Rajkot11Jodhpur9Visakhapatnam8Guwahati8Telangana6Allahabad3Jabalpur3Dehradun2SC2Varanasi2Rajasthan1Patna1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 80P10Section 1488Section 1474Deduction3TDS3Addition to Income3Section 2502Section 143(2)2Disallowance2Limitation/Time-bar

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 149/JAB/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

TDS was also deducted and it is duly reflecting in the Form 26AS and duly shown in the ITR and it was disallowed on frivolous grounds. 4. The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) NFAC was not justified in confirming the action of AO with regard to the deduction claimed by the appellant under section 80P of the act without

2

BRAHTAKAR KRISHI SAKH SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,SAHAJPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), JABALPUR

In the result, all the three appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 151/JAB/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur28 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SH. KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, Advocate & ShFor Respondent: Sh. Alok Bhura, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 80P

TDS was also deducted and it is duly reflecting in the Form 26AS and duly shown in the ITR and it was disallowed on frivolous grounds. 4. The learned Commissioner of Income tax (Appeal) NFAC was not justified in confirming the action of AO with regard to the deduction claimed by the appellant under section 80P of the act without

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1), JABALPUR, JABALPUR vs. PARVINDAR SINGH, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and cross- objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 98/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit, Vs Parvinder Singh, Circle-2(1), 526, Madan Mahal, Jabalpur. Jabalpur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Asaps9672A C.O.No.-9/Jab/2023 (In Ita No.98/Jab/2023) (Assessment Year- 2011- 2012) Parvinder Singh, Vs Acit, 526, Madan Mahal, Circle-2(1), Jabalpur. Jabalpur. (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Asaps9672A Assessee By Shri Dhiraj Ghai, Ca Revenue By Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 20/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22/09/2023

Section 268ASection 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act,1961 without appreciating the fact that the assessee has not proved the deduction of TDS in r/o interest to M/s Hinduja Leyland Finance amounting to Rs. 3,36,000/- and to Indusind Bank Ltd.amounting to Rs. 2,98,794/-. (B) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case