BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

36 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(10)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,868Delhi2,867Bangalore1,317Chennai932Kolkata715Ahmedabad517Pune498Hyderabad414Cochin393Chandigarh337Jaipur324Raipur251Indore246Karnataka230Visakhapatnam139Surat119Cuttack114Nagpur94Rajkot94Lucknow87Jodhpur50Guwahati45Amritsar45Ranchi44Dehradun44Jabalpur36Patna36Agra35Telangana32Panaji28Allahabad18SC18Kerala12Varanasi11Himachal Pradesh7Calcutta7Rajasthan5Uttarakhand3Orissa3Punjab & Haryana2J&K2Gauhati1

Key Topics

TDS32Section 271C20Section 27120Addition to Income11Section 201(1)10Deduction7Section 2506Section 43B5Section 234E5Penalty

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 99/JAB/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section will not apply. 10. In result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. 9 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS III

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 36 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 143(2)4
Section 200A4
ITA 101/JAB/2023[2012-13]Status: Disposed
ITAT Jabalpur
22 Sept 2023
AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section will not apply. 10. In result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. 9 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS III

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 102/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section will not apply. 10. In result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. 9 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS III

MANESSH SHARMA ,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 103/JAB/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section will not apply. 10. In result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. 9 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS III

MANESSH SHARMA,JABALPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, all appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 100/JAB/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur22 Sept 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kantshri Pavan Kumar Gadale

Section 201(1)Section 250Section 271Section 271C

section will not apply. 10. In result, the appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. 9 | P a g e ITA No.99 to 103/Jab/2023 Manessh Sharma vs JCIT-TDS III

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-KATNI, KATNI vs. M/S. GAJRAJ MINING PVT. L:TD., SINGRAULI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as assessee is dismissed

ITA 27/JAB/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur30 Nov 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Us

For Appellant: Sh. Sapan Usrethe, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Kumar Gotru, CIT(DR)
Section 2Section 36(1)(iii)Section 43B

10. Hence we hold that the ld. CIT(A) rightly deleted the addition on account of the TDS. 11. Before us the ld. DR supported the order of the Assessing Officer and the ld. AR relied the order of the ld. CIT(A). 12. Heard the arguments of both the parties and perused the material available on record

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER , CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE ,JABALPUR vs. ITO (TDS)-2, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4/JAB/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur18 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri Shidharth Seth.Adv. ARFor Respondent: Shri.RajeshKumarGupta.Sr.DR
Section 154Section 156Section 190Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 203ASection 204Section 234ESection 285

iii) Shimas- Network-Pvt. Ltd.-VS-CIT-ITAT-Bangalore (iv) Karnataka-Grameena- Bank-Vs-ACIT-ITAT-Bangalore (V) Indiasoft-Technologies-Pvt.- Ltd.-Vs-ACIT-ITAT-Pune (vi) Thomas-Abraham-Vs-ITO-ITAT-Bangalore (vii) Vivek-J-Thar-Vs-Income- Tax-Officer-ITAT-Mumbai (viii) 1608007816-Puran- Shankar Lal Vishwakarma 87- 89-2019 ITAT-Jabalpur 13.That the CIT (Appeals), NFAC

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , LARON BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 62/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,GOURIHAR BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 72/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,PIPAT BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 73/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,KISHANGARH BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 74/JAB/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,BUXWAHA BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 75/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,MANDI ROAD NOWGONG BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 76/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK ,TENDUKHEDA BRANCH., SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 77/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, MAJHOLI BRANCH,MAJHOLI vs. CITO-TDS-2 JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 55/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK NEGUAN BRANCH,NEGUWAN SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 56/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, ORCHHA BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 57/JAB/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK, RAJAPUR BRANCH ,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS) JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 58/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , NIWADI BRANCH,SAGAR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 59/JAB/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012

MADHYANCHAL GRAMIN BANK , MOHANGARH BRANCH,JABALPUR vs. ITO(TDS)-1, JABALPUR, JABALPUR

In the result, the assessee‟s appeals are dismissed

ITA 60/JAB/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur13 Sept 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Sanjay Arora, Hon‟Ble & Shri Manomohan Das, Hon'Ble

III onwards) to f.y. 2014-15 (Qtr-I). 2. The controversy arising in the instant appeals, as projected before us by Shri Chordia, the ld. counsel for the assessee, was with reference to the competence of the Assessing Officer (AO) in levying the fee u/s. 234E, which section stands co- opted on the statute by Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 01/07/2012