BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai669Delhi426Chennai261Bangalore198Kolkata150Chandigarh97Raipur65Cochin59Hyderabad57Ahmedabad56Pune43Jaipur32Visakhapatnam12Lucknow10Surat7SC7Agra6Guwahati6Nagpur6Rajkot6Cuttack5Indore5Dehradun4Panaji4Jabalpur3Karnataka2Amritsar2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

TDS3Disallowance3Addition to Income3

VISHAL DATT,JABLPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 78/JAB/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

TDS had been deducted on payment. In case of labour charges there are very few instances where receiver signature were not found due-to the reason that the amount was collected by the mukaddam i.e. head of the group of labourer same ‘were explained to the AO but he had not accepted and made the adhoc disallowance against the order

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE2(1), JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 77/JAB/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri, Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Shri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: Shri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

TDS had been deducted on payment. In case of labour charges there are very few instances where receiver signature were not found due-to the reason that the amount was collected by the mukaddam i.e. head of the group of labourer same ‘were explained to the AO but he had not accepted and made the adhoc disallowance against the order

VISHAL DATT,JABALPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1) , JABALPUR

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 79/JAB/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur21 May 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri Sanjay Seth, CAFor Respondent: \nShri Alok Bhura, Sr. CIT(DR)

TDS\nhad been deducted on payment. In case of labour charges there are very\nfew instances where receiver signature were not found due-to the reason\nthat the amount was collected by the mukaddam i.e. head of the group of\nlabourer same 'were explained to the AO but he had not accepted and\nmade the adhoc disallowance against the order