BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 5(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,222Delhi4,192Bangalore2,346Chennai1,550Kolkata1,244Pune724Hyderabad626Ahmedabad539Jaipur386Karnataka334Chandigarh315Raipur291Cochin187Indore175Lucknow139Surat127Visakhapatnam104Rajkot99Nagpur93Cuttack77Dehradun76Amritsar59Jodhpur56Telangana46Patna46Jabalpur45Guwahati43Agra40Allahabad36Panaji27Ranchi26SC21Varanasi17Kerala16Calcutta11Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana4J&K4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Uttarakhand2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194A5Section 1944TDS4Section 260A3Addition to Income2

PR.COMM.OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/6/2017HC J&K13 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 260ASection 40

2. For both the assessment years i.e 2010-11 and 2011-12, the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Jammu [‘the Assessing Authority’] decided the issue in favour of the Revenue and held that the Jammu Development Authority [‘JDA’] is a Local Authority which is not exempt from payment of tax and, therefore, the assessee-Bank was under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

ITA/10/2016HC J&K
14 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 260A

2 according consideration to the submissions put forwarded by it, an order under Section 201(1) and under Section 201(1A) of the Act was passed by the Assessing Authority for the Assessment year 2009-10 creating a demand of Rs.2,11,19,843/-. 3. On appeal by the assessee, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT(A)’] deleted

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/45/2013HC J&K03 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194

B-2 3rd Floor Bahu Plaza South Block Gandhi Nagar, Jammu Through Birinder Singh Mohindru, age 39 (Manager Legal and Regulatory) S/o Sh. Kulwant Singh Mohindru R/o H.No. 1193 Sunny Enclave Sector 125, Greater Mohali, Punjab ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Pranav Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Farhan Mirza, Advocate, Mr. Muddassir Zubair, Advocate & 3 ITA No. 43/2013

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/43/2013HC J&K03 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194

B-2 3rd Floor Bahu Plaza South Block Gandhi Nagar, Jammu Through Birinder Singh Mohindru, age 39 (Manager Legal and Regulatory) S/o Sh. Kulwant Singh Mohindru R/o H.No. 1193 Sunny Enclave Sector 125, Greater Mohali, Punjab ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Pranav Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Farhan Mirza, Advocate, Mr. Muddassir Zubair, Advocate & 3 ITA No. 43/2013