BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 2(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,292Mumbai4,170Bangalore2,170Chennai1,467Kolkata1,029Pune636Hyderabad524Ahmedabad510Jaipur372Raipur328Karnataka310Indore310Chandigarh261Cochin252Nagpur198Visakhapatnam156Surat118Rajkot111Lucknow97Cuttack53Patna53Ranchi47Amritsar42Telangana40Agra39Dehradun39Guwahati34Panaji32Jodhpur32Jabalpur19SC19Allahabad17Kerala14Calcutta10Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Varanasi5Orissa3Uttarakhand3J&K2Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194A5Section 260A3TDS2Addition to Income2

PR.COMM.OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/6/2017HC J&K13 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 260ASection 40

2. For both the assessment years i.e 2010-11 and 2011-12, the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Jammu [‘the Assessing Authority’] decided the issue in favour of the Revenue and held that the Jammu Development Authority [‘JDA’] is a Local Authority which is not exempt from payment of tax and, therefore, the assessee-Bank was under

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

ITA/10/2016HC J&K
14 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 260A

2 according consideration to the submissions put forwarded by it, an order under Section 201(1) and under Section 201(1A) of the Act was passed by the Assessing Authority for the Assessment year 2009-10 creating a demand of Rs.2,11,19,843/-. 3. On appeal by the assessee, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [‘CIT(A)’] deleted