BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,840Delhi5,477Bangalore2,647Chennai2,220Kolkata1,784Pune1,036Patna744Ahmedabad688Hyderabad580Cochin569Karnataka474Jaipur444Indore393Chandigarh353Nagpur263Raipur244Lucknow160Visakhapatnam143Rajkot133Surat129Jodhpur108Cuttack100Ranchi82Telangana68Panaji64Agra61Amritsar59Guwahati55Dehradun55Jabalpur41SC25Calcutta21Allahabad19Kerala17Varanasi12Himachal Pradesh6Rajasthan6J&K5Punjab & Haryana5Orissa4Uttarakhand2Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194A5TDS5Section 1944Section 1543Section 260A3Section 2442Deduction2Addition to Income2

PR.COMM.OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/6/2017HC J&K13 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(f)Section 260ASection 40

deduction of TDS on account of interest paid to the Jammu Development Authority even when the same is taxable entity

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD.

ITA/10/2016HC J&K14 Jul 2023

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194ASection 194A(3)(iii)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 260A

TDS Circle, Aayakar Bhawan, Rail Head Complex, Jammu that during the Assessment year 2009-10, the respondent-Bank [‘the assessee’] was not deducting

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/45/2013HC J&K03 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194

TDS) Aayakar Bhawan, Rail Head Complex, Jammu ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocate ORDER 03.04.2024 1. These appeals (five in number) have been filed by the appellant against the common order dated 22.04.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, praying for setting aside the same, whereby the ITAT has held that the distributor

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/43/2013HC J&K03 Apr 2024

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PUNEET GUPTA

Section 194

TDS) Aayakar Bhawan, Rail Head Complex, Jammu ….Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Suraj Singh Wazir, Advocate ORDER 03.04.2024 1. These appeals (five in number) have been filed by the appellant against the common order dated 22.04.2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar, praying for setting aside the same, whereby the ITAT has held that the distributor

J AND K BANK LTD.RAIL HEAD COMPLEX JAMMU vs. JT.COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX

ITA/10/2009HC J&K14 Aug 2025

Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR

Section 154Section 2Section 244Section 260

Deduction Certifcates were defective, especially when the certificates have been duly accepted and interest paid from April, 1993 to December 1993”? Serial No. 11 2 ITA No. 10/2009 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused material on record, we are of the considered opinion that the question No. (i), formulated by this Court, is in no manner