BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 801Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai90Delhi44Ahmedabad25Kolkata24Chennai15Hyderabad13Jaipur10Cuttack10Rajkot8Indore7Jodhpur4Dehradun2Bangalore2Amritsar2Nagpur2Pune2Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 80I25Section 14715Section 8010Disallowance7Deduction5Reassessment5Reopening of Assessment5Limitation/Time-bar2Condonation of Delay

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S. MANISH AGRO TECH PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result grounds of revenue for A

ITA 218/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ruchira SinghalFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

transfer pricing proceedings. Whenever a notice was received from the TPO, it was forwarded to the counsel at Ahmedabad. Cross Objection Nos.5 & 6/Ind/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2015-16 4.8. The appellant had filed substantial documents for vindicating its transactions held with sister concern. This is also evident from the written submission filed before the TPO, copies enclosed at page

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S. MANISH AGRO TECH PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result grounds of revenue for A

ITA 219/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2023
2
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ruchira SinghalFor Respondent: Shri P.K Mishra, CIT (DR)

transfer pricing proceedings. Whenever a notice was received from the TPO, it was forwarded to the counsel at Ahmedabad. Cross Objection Nos.5 & 6/Ind/2020 Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2015-16 4.8. The appellant had filed substantial documents for vindicating its transactions held with sister concern. This is also evident from the written submission filed before the TPO, copies enclosed at page

SHREENATHJI INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.,PIPARIYA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , ITARSI

ITA 312/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 147Section 80Section 80I

801A are clearly distinguishable and would not buttress its claim for the said deduction. In the facts of the present case I hold that the appellant undertook work on contract basis. Respectfully following the ratio laid down in the decisions discussed above, I hold that the appellant is a mere contractor executing civil works contracts for various agencies

SHREENATHJI INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.,PIPARIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , ITARSI

ITA 310/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 147Section 80Section 80I

801A are clearly distinguishable and would not buttress its claim for the said deduction. In the facts of the present case I hold that the appellant undertook work on contract basis. Respectfully following the ratio laid down in the decisions discussed above, I hold that the appellant is a mere contractor executing civil works contracts for various agencies

SHREENATHJI INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.,PIPARIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , ITARSI

ITA 314/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 147Section 80Section 80I

801A are clearly distinguishable and would not buttress its claim for the said deduction. In the facts of the present case I hold that the appellant undertook work on contract basis. Respectfully following the ratio laid down in the decisions discussed above, I hold that the appellant is a mere contractor executing civil works contracts for various agencies

SHREENATHJI INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.,PIPARIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , ITARSI

ITA 313/IND/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 147Section 80Section 80I

801A are clearly distinguishable and would not buttress its claim for the said deduction. In the facts of the present case I hold that the appellant undertook work on contract basis. Respectfully following the ratio laid down in the decisions discussed above, I hold that the appellant is a mere contractor executing civil works contracts for various agencies

SHREENATHJI INFRASTRUCTURE P.LTD.,PIPARIYA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , ITARSI

ITA 311/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 147Section 80Section 80I

801A are clearly distinguishable and would not buttress its claim for the said deduction. In the facts of the present case I hold that the appellant undertook work on contract basis. Respectfully following the ratio laid down in the decisions discussed above, I hold that the appellant is a mere contractor executing civil works contracts for various agencies