S.P.ENTERPRISES,INDORE vs. THE ACIT2(1), INDORE
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 216/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Feb 2024AY 2016-17
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanis.P. Enterprises Acit 2(1) Ug-9 Lokhandwala Complex Indore Gangali Square Ringh Road, Vs. Indore, Mp (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Ackfs0827M Assessee By Ms. Nisha Lahoti & Shri Vijay Bansal Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 21.02.2024
Section 143(3)Section 145
145. 4.On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable law, Ld.
CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition made by Ld. AO of Rs.
32,73,637 without considering the written submissions and documentary evidences placed on record in proper perspective.
5.The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or otherwise raise any other ground of appeal