BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 80P(2)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Panaji59Pune50Bangalore47Cochin45Mumbai32Delhi28Hyderabad26Jaipur22Kolkata18Rajkot14Chennai13Ahmedabad11Nagpur8Chandigarh8Visakhapatnam4Amritsar3Karnataka3Indore3Lucknow3Cuttack2Kerala2Jabalpur2Surat1SC1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)8Section 2633Section 80P(2)(vi)2Deduction2Disallowance2

KESLA POULTRY SAHAKARI MY,SUKHTAWA vs. ACIT,CIRCLE ITARSI, ITARSI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are

ITA 654/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(vi)

68,222/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’). The A.O. on scrutiny, disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act. Aggrieved against this, the assessee appeared before the Ld. CIT(A), who after considering the submissions of the assessee confirmed the order

KESLA POULTRY SAHAKARI MY.,SUKHTAWA vs. ACIT , CIRCLE , ITARSK

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are

ITA 655/IND/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore
27 Sept 2019
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(vi)

68,222/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’). The A.O. on scrutiny, disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(vi) of the Act. Aggrieved against this, the assessee appeared before the Ld. CIT(A), who after considering the submissions of the assessee confirmed the order

SEWA SAHKARI SAMMITTEE MARYADIT,BEED, MUNDI KHANDWA vs. PCIT-1, INDORE

In the result, appeal by the assesse is allowed

ITA 44/IND/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Oct 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanisewa Sahkari Sammittee Pr. Cit-2 Maryadit Beed Indore Vs. Beed Mundi Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aaufs0703N Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhullar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 05.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 30.10.2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263 cannot be invoked by the Pr. CIT. 8. That Explanation 2 to s. 263 inserted w.e.f. 01.06.2015 does not override the law as interpreted by the various High Courts whereby it is held that the CIT cannot treat the AO's order as being erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue without himself conducting an enquiry