BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 5Oclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore7Delhi3Hyderabad3Telangana2Bangalore1Jaipur1Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 6824Addition to Income7Section 50C6Section 143(3)5Depreciation4Unexplained Cash Credit3Disallowance3Unexplained Investment2

M/S. FROLIC REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE ITO 3(3), INDORE

In the result, these three appeals of by different assessees in ITANo

ITA 364/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble I Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11 Avocado Trading Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company, Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4206K Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aspirant Mercantile Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company,Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4207J

Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 68 on the alleged ground that it is unexplained cash credit. Avocado Trading Co. and others ITA Nos.362 to 364/Ind/2012 2. The Appellant prays that the said addition be deleted. GROUND 2: ADDITION OF TRADE ADVANCES AS UNEXPLAINED CREDIT 1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred

M/S. AVOCADO TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE ITO 3(3), INDORE

In the result, these three appeals of by different assessees in ITANo

ITA 362/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble I Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11 Avocado Trading Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company, Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4206K Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aspirant Mercantile Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company,Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4207J

Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 68 on the alleged ground that it is unexplained cash credit. Avocado Trading Co. and others ITA Nos.362 to 364/Ind/2012 2. The Appellant prays that the said addition be deleted. GROUND 2: ADDITION OF TRADE ADVANCES AS UNEXPLAINED CREDIT 1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred

M/S. ASPIRANT MERCANTILE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE ITO 3(3), INDORE

In the result, these three appeals of by different assessees in ITANo

ITA 363/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble I Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11 Avocado Trading Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company, Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4206K Assessment Year: 2010-11 Aspirant Mercantile Company Private Ito 3(3) Limited Indore बनाम/ G.J. Shah & Company,Chartered Vs. Accountants 404, Manas Bhawan, 11 Rnt Marg, Indore-452001 (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aagca4207J

Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 68 on the alleged ground that it is unexplained cash credit. Avocado Trading Co. and others ITA Nos.362 to 364/Ind/2012 2. The Appellant prays that the said addition be deleted. GROUND 2: ADDITION OF TRADE ADVANCES AS UNEXPLAINED CREDIT 1.On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred

M/S MALVIKA AGROTECH PVT. LTD.,DHAR vs. THE ITO-2(2), INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes”

ITA 358/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Sept 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S Malvika Agrotech Ito, 2(2), Pvt. Ltd, Indore Plot No.185, Sector-1, Pithampur, Dhar (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan No.Aaccm6451G Revenue By Shri P.K. Mitra, Sr. Dr Assessee By Shri C.P. Rawka,Ca Date Of Hearing 10.09.2018 Date Of 19.9.2018 Pronouncement

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 50CSection 68

68 as discussed above Total income assessed Rs.1,38,78,807/- Less: Unabsorbed business loses of earlier years Rs.3319385/- Unabsorbed depreciation Rs. 84,18,886/- Of earlier years Rs.5099501/- Net taxable income Rs.54,59,521/- 3. Aggrieved assesee preferred an appeal before Ld.CIT(A) and partly succeeded. 4. Now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising sole issue

M/S URVASHI WORLD WIDE P LTD, INDORE,INDORE vs. ITO,WARD 4(5), INDORE, INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 411/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Sept 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Urvashi World Wide Income Tax Officer Pvt.Ltd, Vs. Ward 4(5), 305, D/S-3 Scheme No.78, Indore Indore (Appellant) (Respondent ) Pan No.Aaacu2067J

Section 143(3)Section 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 68

68 of the Act amounting to Rs.50 lacs being the amounts received towards share capital and premium thereon in earlier years from M/s. Clifton Securities Pvt Ltd, Mis Zenser Merchandise Pvt Ltd & M/s Bhuwania Vinimay Pvt Ltd. He did 110t appreciate that such amount by way of share application money was received in earlier years whereas shares were issued during

JCIT OSD (CENTRAL)-1, RATLAM vs. SHRI KANTILAL KATARIA, RATLAM

ITA 259/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Aug 2021

Bench: Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

5O,000/- without considering and appreciating the material fact that the appellant had disclosed additional income to the extent of Rs.2,60,00,000/-, over and above the additional income of Rs.l,OO,OO,OOO/- surrendered on account of unaccounted business of scrap and investment therein, and the entire additional income of Rs.2,60,00,000/- was available

ACIT (CENTRAL) 1 INDORE , INDORE vs. SHRI KANTILAL KATARIA, RATLAM

ITA 886/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore02 Aug 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

5O,000/- without considering and appreciating the material fact that the appellant had disclosed additional income to the extent of Rs.2,60,00,000/-, over and above the additional income of Rs.l,OO,OO,OOO/- surrendered on account of unaccounted business of scrap and investment therein, and the entire additional income of Rs.2,60,00,000/- was available