Search: section 68

15 results for “section 68”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 54B15 Addition to Income15 Section 143(3)13 Section 26313 Section 143(2)8 Section 271(1)(c)8 Penalty8 Section 687 Deduction6 Cash Deposit

SHRI SUKHRAM MUKATI,INDORE vs. THE ITO WD-3(3), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of Shri Sukhram Mukati and

ITA 409/IND/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.409&410/Ind/2014 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2008-09

Section 143Section 54BSection 68Section 69Section 69A

54B that by holding that lands are not registered in assessee`s name. The non allowance so made being illegal and wrong, the require to be now allowed. 2. That the learned CIT (A) erred in making addition of Rs. 58, 72,000 under section 68

KUSUM YADAV,INDORE vs. ITO 1(2), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

SHRI SUKHRAM MUKATI,INDORE vs. THE ITO WD-3(3), INDORE

KUSUM YADAV,INDORE vs. ITO 1(2), INDORE

SHRI SUKHRAM MUKATI,INDORE vs. THE ITO WD-3(3), INDORE

KUSUM YADAV,INDORE vs. ITO 1(2), INDORE

SATYANARAYAN SHARMA,INDORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, INDORE

SMT NAYANA JAYESH PATEL ,INDORE vs. ACIT ( OSD ) , INDORE

SHRI SUNIL SOJATIA,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE -2(1), INDORE

SHRI PRABHAT SOJATIA,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 2(1), INDORE

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. M/S. CHUGH REALTY, INDORE

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. SHRI MOHANLAL CHUGH, INDORE

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. SHRI NITESH CHUGH, INDORE

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE