Search: section 68

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 115B11 Section 270A11 Section 687 Section 1546 Section 271A5 Addition to Income5 Section 2634 Section 143(3)4 Section 2743 Penalty

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 344/IND/2023[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 May 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaabhushan Dhamnod Ito, Dhar 1St Floor, Ganpati Market Ab Road Dhamnod Vs. Mp (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Abgfa0812K Assessee By Shri Pranay Goyal & Shri S.N. Goyal, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 09.05.2024 O R D E R

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

9. We have considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record. The AO has made an addition on account of unsecured loan as under: “1. Addition on account of unsecured loan: The assessee has shown unsecured loan at Rs.6,64,991/- in you audit report. However, no confirmation and details have been furnished by the assessee. Therefore

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

MANOJ KUMAR GANGADHARAN,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT AND TP) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

MANOJ KUMAR GANGADHARAN,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT AND TP) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

RAM BABU SINGH,BIHAR vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

M/S PUNYA SHREE JEWELLERS,S4EONI MALWA vs. THE PCIT-1 , BHOPAL

GAURAV AJMERA,RATLAM vs. DCIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE