Search: section 68

12 results for “section 68”+ Section 270A(8)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 270A18 Section 115B15 Section 6815 Section 14712 Section 14412 Addition to Income12 Section 271A10 Penalty10 Section 2637 Section 139

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 344/IND/2023[AY 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 May 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniaabhushan Dhamnod Ito, Dhar 1St Floor, Ganpati Market Ab Road Dhamnod Vs. Mp (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Abgfa0812K Assessee By Shri Pranay Goyal & Shri S.N. Goyal, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 09.05.2024 O R D E R

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, where identity, genuineness and creditworthiness stands established. Thus, there was no reason for the Ld. CIT(A) to take a different view in assessment year under appeal i.e., 2009-2010. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that initial burden upon the assessee to prove

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

SRIYANS KUMAR JAIN HUF,BERASIA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

AABHUSHAN,DHAMNOD, MADHYA PRADESH vs. ITO DHAR, DHAR

SRIYANS KUMAR JAIN HUF,BERASIA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

RAM BABU SINGH,BIHAR vs. THE ITO-2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

M/S PUNYA SHREE JEWELLERS,S4EONI MALWA vs. THE PCIT-1 , BHOPAL

MANOJ KUMAR GANGADHARAN,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT AND TP) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

GAURAV AJMERA,RATLAM vs. DCIT(CENTRAL)-2, INDORE

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEWAS

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEWAS

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEWAS

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEWAS

NAJMA PATHAN,DEWAS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEWAS