BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “section 68”+ Section 269Tclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur34Delhi24Mumbai20Pune17Ahmedabad13Hyderabad12Indore12Nagpur12Kolkata10Bangalore9Visakhapatnam9Surat7Lucknow5Rajkot4Chennai3Chandigarh3Cuttack2Cochin2Amritsar1SC1Jabalpur1Telangana1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D40Section 13210Section 271E10Penalty10Limitation/Time-bar10Section 143(3)5Section 2634Section 40A(3)2Section 143(2)2Section 68

THE DCIT1(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAVI ARORA, INDORE

ITA 212/IND/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year:2011-12 Dcit-5(1), Shri Ravi Arora, Indore 1007, Khatiwala Tank, बनाम/ 236, Indraprasth Tower, 6, M.G. Road, Vs. Indore. (Revenue / Appellant) (Assessee / Respondent) Pan: Agdpa8921H Assessee By Shri Yash Kukreja, Ca & Shri Hitesh Chimnani, Adv & Ld. Ars Revenue By Shri P.K.Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 04.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.07.2023

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40A(3)Section 68

68 in respect of opening balances when there is no sum credited in the current year. Secondly, in so far as the loan of Rs. 55,00,000/- accepted during the year from M/s Jayant is concerned, the CIT(A) has followed the decision of ITAT, Indore Bench in Tirupati Construction (supra) where the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of loans

M/S RADHISHWARI DEVLOPERS P LTD,INDORE vs. PR CIT -2 INDORE, INDORE

In the result, Assessee’s appeal in ITANo

2
Addition to Income2
ITA 493/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Jul 2021

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Radhishwari Developers P. Ltd. (Now Known As R.C. Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. ) Indore : Appellant Pan :Aafcr1916A V/S Pr. Cito-2 : Respondent Indore Appellant By S/Shri Sumit Nema Sr. Adv. With Gagan Tiwari & Piyush Parashar Advs. Revenue By Shri S.S. Mantri, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 24.05.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 20.07.2021

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

section 263 is not permitted to substitute his estimate of income in place of the income estimated by the Assessing Officer. (vii) The Assessing Officer exercises quasi-judicial power vested in him and if he exercises such power in accordance with law and arrive at a conclusion, such conclusion cannot be termed to be erroneous simply because the Commissioner

SH LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE, BHOPAL

ITA 260/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

SH LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE, BHOPAL

ITA 261/IND/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

M/S LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL. CIT, GWALIOR

ITA 252/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADD.CIT RANGE -BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 253/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT -RANGE,BHOPAL, BHOPAL

ITA 254/IND/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT -RANGE , BHOPAL

ITA 255/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

M/S LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL. CIT, GWALIOR

ITA 257/IND/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

M/S LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL. CIT, GWALIOR

ITA 258/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE, BHOPAL

ITA 256/IND/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change

SH LAXMI NARAYAN SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. ADDL.CIT CENTRAL RANGE, BHOPAL

ITA 259/IND/2021[2014--15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 May 2023

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 132Section 271DSection 271E

68,50,000 3,11,17,500 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal but could not succeed. Still aggrieved, the assessee has come in these appeals before us assailing the orders of lower authorities. 6. Learned Representatives of both sides agree that the issue and facts involved in all these ten appeals are identical except change