SHRIMATI SHARDA KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (I), INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this sub-section available to the Assessing Officer for making an order

M/S NISHANT FINANCE PVT.LTD,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CENTRAL (I), INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this sub-section available to the Assessing Officer for making an order

SUMATI KUMAR KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this sub-section available to the Assessing Officer for making an order

PARTH KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (I), INDORE , INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this sub-section available to the Assessing Officer for making an order

MANOJ KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (1), INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this sub-section available to the Assessing Officer for making an order

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1,, INDORE vs. SHRI RAJUL BHARGAVA, INDORE

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

245D(4) dated 15.05.2015, the ITSC rejected the applications filed by the assessees and the proceedings before the Commission were abated from the date of order before the ITSC. Fresh notices u/s 153A were issued for AYs. 2008-09 to 2014-15 and the assessment proceedings were carried out u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) and completed u/s 153A r.w.s

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE vs. SHRI RAUNAK MARU, INDORE

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

245D(4) dated 15.05.2015, the ITSC rejected the applications filed by the assessees and the proceedings before the Commission were abated from the date of order before the ITSC. Fresh notices u/s 153A were issued for AYs. 2008-09 to 2014-15 and the assessment proceedings were carried out u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) and completed u/s 153A r.w.s

THE DCIT, (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE, BHOPAL vs. M/S. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, BHOPAL

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

section 12A - list of honors submitted Incomplete details of donors does not mean donations are unaccounted money - Addition oj Donations as cash credit and denying benefit not justified - Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 11, 12A, 68." 3.14 As decided in the cases of Vaishnavi Educations Society vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ITAT Hyderabad Tribunal {B} {20l5

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) CIRCLE BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MAYANK WELFARE SOCIETY, INDORE

In the result, Revenue’s appeal for the AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Ms. Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2013-14

section 12A - list of honors submitted Incomplete details of donors does not mean donations are unaccounted money - Addition oj Donations as cash credit and denying benefit not justified - Income-tax Act, 1961, ss. 11, 12A, 68." 3.14 As decided in the cases of Vaishnavi Educations Society vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ITAT Hyderabad Tribunal {B} {20l5