SUMATI KUMAR KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause

PARTH KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (I), INDORE , INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause

MANOJ KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (1), INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause

M/S PUMARTH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD.,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause

SHRIMATI SHARDA KASLIWAL,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- CENTRAL (I), INDORE, INDORE

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Borad

245C and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section; or shall be excluded. Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the aforesaid period, the period of limitation referred to in clause

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1,, INDORE vs. SHRI RAJUL BHARGAVA, INDORE

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

68,000/- (22.50 minus 13.0632) be not brought to tax in the relevant assessment year. Finally an addition of Rs. 4,71,84,000 each was made in the hands of both the partners in AY 2012-13 on account of sale of land at Mayakhedi and change of partners of the firm M/s RNR Devcon in the regular assessment

ACIT(CENTRAL)-1, INDORE, INDORE vs. SHRI RAUNAK MARU, INDORE

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

68,000/- (22.50 minus 13.0632) be not brought to tax in the relevant assessment year. Finally an addition of Rs. 4,71,84,000 each was made in the hands of both the partners in AY 2012-13 on account of sale of land at Mayakhedi and change of partners of the firm M/s RNR Devcon in the regular assessment