BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “section 68”+ Section 11Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai38Delhi29Bangalore14SC13Ahmedabad13Lucknow11Kolkata8Chandigarh8Cochin7Jaipur7Karnataka7Indore6Nagpur5Visakhapatnam2Calcutta2Hyderabad2Telangana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 14725Section 143(3)22Section 80I20Section 14810Section 106Deduction6Reassessment5Reopening of Assessment5Limitation/Time-bar5Section 11

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 370/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

11A of Section 80IB has been elaborately analysed and it is observed that processing should not be confined to the operations that would entail the preservation of fruits/vegetable as they are without change of their identity. If the processing and preservation is confined only to the fruitsas such and not to be derivatives from fruits the benefit intended

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

2
ITA 371/IND/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

11A of Section 80IB has been elaborately analysed and it is observed that processing should not be confined to the operations that would entail the preservation of fruits/vegetable as they are without change of their identity. If the processing and preservation is confined only to the fruitsas such and not to be derivatives from fruits the benefit intended

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 372/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

11A of Section 80IB has been elaborately analysed and it is observed that processing should not be confined to the operations that would entail the preservation of fruits/vegetable as they are without change of their identity. If the processing and preservation is confined only to the fruitsas such and not to be derivatives from fruits the benefit intended

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 373/IND/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

11A of Section 80IB has been elaborately analysed and it is observed that processing should not be confined to the operations that would entail the preservation of fruits/vegetable as they are without change of their identity. If the processing and preservation is confined only to the fruitsas such and not to be derivatives from fruits the benefit intended

ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 4(1), INDORE, INDORE vs. PRATAAP SNACKS LIMITED, INDORE

In the result revenue’s appeal is dismissed and assessee’s cross-objection is allowed

ITA 374/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Oct 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 80I

11A of Section 80IB has been elaborately analysed and it is observed that processing should not be confined to the operations that would entail the preservation of fruits/vegetable as they are without change of their identity. If the processing and preservation is confined only to the fruitsas such and not to be derivatives from fruits the benefit intended

M/S. HERO'S EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed

ITA 232/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jan 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 68

68 received mainly from society members. The assessee society has been denied claimed exemption u/s 11 and u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) as claimed during assessment proceedings. 4. Being aggrieved the assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). 5. During the course of appeal proceedings, the assessee has submitted that the assessee society was entitled to exemption