BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 548clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai126Delhi104Ahmedabad32Bangalore29Jaipur20Chandigarh17Chennai15Pune12Kolkata12Surat11Indore9Nagpur6Raipur5Hyderabad5Jodhpur2Telangana1Cochin1Rajkot1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 26321Section 1488Section 153A7Section 1477Addition to Income7Section 686Section 80I6Section 143(3)5Section 69C

SANTOSH RATHORE,INDORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE - 1, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 451/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263

147 r.w.s 144B of the Act dated\n28/03/2022 from which the present revision proceedings u/s 263 of the Act\noriginated.\nIt is true that before us, assessee has challenged the order passed by the Id.\nPr. CIT u/s.263 of the Act, however, since the assessee has raised the issue\nof validity of reassessment order, we first answer the question

JAYANTILAL SANGHVI,INDORE vs. ACIT 4(1), INDORE

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

4
Reassessment4
Limitation/Time-bar3
Condonation of Delay2
ITA 539/IND/2023[A.Y. 2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2024

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2012-13 Jayantilal Sanghvi, Acit, 8/10, Warehouse Road, 4(1), बनाम/ Patel Bridge, Indore. Vs. Indore. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Agtps5825Q Assessee By Shri Venus Rawka, C.A. Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement .06.2024

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

reassessment order dated 13-12- 2016 passed under section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act, there is a reference to the fact that previously section 143(3) assessment order had been framed on 24-12-2011. (iii) Lastly and more importantly, the reopening was triggered, based on a statement made by one Mr Sanjeeva Kumar Sinha, Director

THE ACIT, CIRCLE, RATLAM vs. M/S. MAHALAXMI INVESTMENT AND TRADING PVT. LTD., RATLAM

ITA 956/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 May 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Miss Madhumita Roy

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80I

147 of the Act dated 31.03.2015 & 31.08.2015 framed by DCIT, Ratlam. 2. Registry has informed that the Cross objection No.02/Ind/2020 and Cross Objection No.03/Ind/2020 filed by the assessee are time barred by three years 29 days. Ld. counsel for the assessee referring to the affidavit and condonation application requested for condoning the delay in filing these cross objections. Ld. Departmental

THE ACIT CIRCLE,RATLAM vs. M/S. MAHALAXMI INVESTMENT AND TRADING PVT. LTD., RATLAM

ITA 955/IND/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 May 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manish Borad & Miss Madhumita Roy

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 80I

147 of the Act dated 31.03.2015 & 31.08.2015 framed by DCIT, Ratlam. 2. Registry has informed that the Cross objection No.02/Ind/2020 and Cross Objection No.03/Ind/2020 filed by the assessee are time barred by three years 29 days. Ld. counsel for the assessee referring to the affidavit and condonation application requested for condoning the delay in filing these cross objections. Ld. Departmental

SANJAY KUMAR BOMB LEGAL HEIR OF LATE SHRI AJIT KUMAR BOMB,NEEMUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NEEMUCH, NEEMUCH

Appeal is disposed off in effective manner and not as

ITA 907/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshisanjay Kumar Bombl/H Of Income Tax Officer, बना Late Ajit Kumar Bomb, Neemuch म/ 18, Bunglow No.41, Vs. Bhuteshwar Mandir Road, Neemuch (Pan: Aappb8200L) (Appellant) (Revenue) Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29.04.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R

Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 271(1)(c)

147 of the Income Tax Act without allowing the assessee an opportunity to cross examine the person on the basis of whose statement the L.d. A.O. has proposed and finally made addition in the reassessment proceedings inspite of the fact that the assessee has specifically requested to give such opportunity. The Re- assessment order so passed

SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR PARASHAR,INDORE vs. THE DCIT/ACIT 1 (2), INDORE

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 411/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Bhawani Shankar Pr. Cit-1 Prashar Indore 28, Lasudia Mori, Vijay Vs. Nagar, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Bgbpp 2475 G Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 02.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 21.06.2023

Section 263

reassessment proceedings since those notices were in their knowledge as they were served physically. However, show cause notices and order passed by the Ld Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Indore was never served physically to the appellant as a result of which the appellant was totally unaware of the fact that show cause notices had been issued and order

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

ITA 68/IND/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 69ASection 69C

548 to examination to the 552 (by CA. Shri H.P. assessee. Agrawal). Depsite making a specific request, the AO did not examine Shri Mukesh Jhawar or Shri H.P. Agrawal. 14 Case of the The case of the - Our written - assessee is assessee is submission distinguishabl distinguishable from before e from the that of the case of PCIT

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

ITA 67/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 69ASection 69C

548 to examination to the 552 (by CA. Shri H.P. assessee. Agrawal). Depsite making a specific request, the AO did not examine Shri Mukesh Jhawar or Shri H.P. Agrawal. 14 Case of the The case of the - Our written - assessee is assessee is submission distinguishabl distinguishable from before e from the that of the case of PCIT

SHRI M A KHAN,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 3(1), BHOPAL

ITA 105/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) It(Ss)A Nos.37 To 42/Ind/2015 & Assessment Years: 2004-05 To 2010-11 Late M.A. Khan Acit 3(1) (Through L/H Nazhat Bhopal Parveen Khan) बनाम/ B-90, Housing Board, Vs. Kohefiza, Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan:Aewpk 3620 C Assessee By Ms. Nisha Lahoti & Shri Vijay Bansal, Ars Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 12.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 153A(1)

reassess' to completed assessment proceedings. vi. In so far as pending assessments are concerned, the jurisdiction to make the original assessment and the assessment under Section 153A merges into one. Only one assessment shall be made separately for each AY on the basis of the findings of the search and any other material existing or brought on the record