BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai116Delhi47Raipur31Bangalore18Hyderabad18Kolkata16Ahmedabad16Pune15Jaipur14Cochin11Chennai11Surat8Nagpur7Indore6Visakhapatnam5Lucknow5Cuttack4Allahabad3Jodhpur1Ranchi1Chandigarh1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)19Section 14712Section 1488Section 2636Disallowance6Section 43B4Reassessment4Section 271E3Penalty3Reopening of Assessment

RNG CONSTRUCTION CO,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL.,JT.,DY.,ASSTT.ITO, BHOPAL

ITA 230/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

43B of the IT, 1961. I have, therefore, reason to believe that the income to the extent of Rs.10,62,939/- which is chargeable to tax, has escaped assessment for the F.Y. 2014-15 relevant to the A.Y. 2015-16 within the meaning of section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961." [emphasis supplied] 6. Ld. AR thereafter drew

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ACIT-3(1), BHOPAL

3
Section 36(1)(va)2
Addition to Income2

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 275/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

reassessment. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified in upholding that the receipt from job work of mixing of rubber at Rs. 34,19,894 was not the business receipts/income and in confirming the same was income from other sources. 3.On the facts and in the circumstances

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO-2(1), BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 277/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

reassessment. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified in upholding that the receipt from job work of mixing of rubber at Rs. 34,19,894 was not the business receipts/income and in confirming the same was income from other sources. 3.On the facts and in the circumstances

RVR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL. CIT-RANGE-3, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal for A

ITA 276/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 May 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271E

reassessment. 2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the honourable CIT(A) was not justified in upholding that the receipt from job work of mixing of rubber at Rs. 34,19,894 was not the business receipts/income and in confirming the same was income from other sources. 3.On the facts and in the circumstances

THE ACIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. SANWARIA AGRO OILS LIMITED, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 706/IND/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 May 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 14ASection 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)Section 43B

147 read with section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) and ITA No. 80/Ind/2010 and CO No. 3/Ind/2010 were also pertaining to the assessment year 2006-07 which arose from the assessment order dated 16.12.2008 passed under section 143(3) of the Act and there is no substantial change in the facts and circumstnaces

M/S M.P.WAREHOUSING & LOGISTIC CORPORATION,BHOPAL vs. THE PR CIT-1, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 106/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2015-16 M/S M.P. Warehousing Pr. Cit-1 & Logistic Corporation, Bhopal बनाम/ Office Complex, Block-1, Gautam Nagar, Vs. Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Aadcm 7742 B Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

43B. Thus, Ld. AR submits, it is quite apparent without saying anything that the Ld. PCIT has not examined the record of assessment, much less consideration thereof, and accorded approval in a mechanical manner without application of mind. 11. Finally, Ld. AR argued that the revision-proceeding conducted in such a manner is not in accordance with