BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 282(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi245Mumbai209Jaipur79Amritsar62Bangalore51Chandigarh47Ahmedabad40Pune31Raipur29Hyderabad24Rajkot23Chennai22Kolkata22Patna16Cochin13Agra8Surat7Indore6Jodhpur4Nagpur3Allahabad3Visakhapatnam3Dehradun2Cuttack1Ranchi1SC1Varanasi1Telangana1Lucknow1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 26312Section 1487Section 1476Section 1434Section 694Addition to Income4Section 1393Reassessment3Section 148A

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 (1), INDORE vs. SHRI SANJEEV PATNI, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 189/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sanjeev Patni Indore Pan:Aftpp6237Q : Appellant

Section 10Section 139Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 69

147 Taxman 441; and RAM SINGH MATHUR [2007] 112 TTJ 989 (DELHI) (ITAT Delhi Bench). 10. We further find that this Tribunal vide order dated 20.5.2021 in the case of M/s. Swastik Coal Corporation P. Ltd., Indore in ITA No. for the A.Y. 477/Ind/2013 (A.Y. 2005-06) has decided the identical issue of service of notice u/s 143(2

2
Section 1442
Capital Gains2
Long Term Capital Gains2

SHRI SANJEEV PATNI,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 62/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore01 Sept 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Hon’Ble Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sanjeev Patni Indore Pan:Aftpp6237Q : Appellant

Section 10Section 139Section 143Section 144Section 147Section 69

147 Taxman 441; and RAM SINGH MATHUR [2007] 112 TTJ 989 (DELHI) (ITAT Delhi Bench). 10. We further find that this Tribunal vide order dated 20.5.2021 in the case of M/s. Swastik Coal Corporation P. Ltd., Indore in ITA No. for the A.Y. 477/Ind/2013 (A.Y. 2005-06) has decided the identical issue of service of notice u/s 143(2

SANDHYA SINGH ,BHOPAL vs. ITO (2)(3), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 585/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Apr 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2014-15 Sandhya Singh Nfac, 121, Rohit Nagar, New Delhi बनाम/ Bawadia Kala, Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aycps9215K Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari & Ms. Priyal Jain, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 19.03.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 17.04.2026

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 149(1)(b)Section 69A

147 of the Act based on the notice u/s 148 dated 31.03.2021 which was issued and served upon the assessee on 1st April, 2021 is bad in law as the same was issued without following the due procedure as provided under the amendment section 148 and 148A of the Act and the consequent reassessment order passed is hereby quashed

GURVINDER KAUR BHATIA ,INDORE vs. PR. CIT-2, INDORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 151/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Dec 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2015-16

Section 263

147 or 148(2) of the Act. ii. He/She may consider any order passed by the Assessing Officer as erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. This is exercised by calling for and examining the record available at this stage. iii. If after calling for and examining the records the Commissioner considers that the order

HARLEEN KAUR BHATIA,INDORE vs. PR. CIT-2, INDORE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 150/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Dec 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Years: 2015-16

Section 263

147 or 148(2) of the Act. ii. He/She may consider any order passed by the Assessing Officer as erroneous as well as prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. This is exercised by calling for and examining the record available at this stage. iii. If after calling for and examining the records the Commissioner considers that the order

SHRI KAILASH CHAND GARG,INDORE vs. THE DCIT, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 262/IND/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 Jan 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2005-06

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 282Section 69

u/s 148 of the Kailash Chandra Garg Income tax by Assessing Officer for reopening of assessment proceedings of appellant and consequent assessment order passed by Assessing Officer. 2. The learned Respondent and CIT(A) failed to appreciate provision of Section 147 read with section 282 of the Income Tax Act, 1961for initiation of reassessment