Search: reassessment u/s 147 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 145Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh25 Mumbai20 Ahmedabad16 Agra8 Kolkata8 Delhi6 Chennai5 Pune3 Indore2 Hyderabad2 Jaipur2 Lucknow1 Cochin1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 1486 Section 143(3)6 Section 1472 Section 145A2 Reassessment2 Addition to Income2

THE ACIT, 3(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. NARMADA TRANSMISSION PVT. LTD., BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 215/IND/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 May 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’Ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’Blea.Y. 2007-08

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 147Section 148

reassessment u/s 147 of the Act. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee has not complied with the provisions of section 145A

M/S CUMMINS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,DEWAS vs. THE ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), UJJAIN

In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 53/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Aug 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanicummins Technologies Acit Circle -1(1) India Pvt. Ltd. Ujjain Industrial Area No.2 A.B. Vs. Road Industrial Area Dewas (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aabct2018B Assessee By Shri Ketan K. Ved. Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 25.08.2023

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 44A

reassessment order. Thus, he has submitted that the reopening is not valid and liable to be quashed. The Ld. AR has submitted that though the writ petition filed by the assesse challenging the validity of the reopening of the assessment was dismissed by the Hon’ble High Court however, it was specifically observed while passing the order that anything observed