BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 10A(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai102Delhi61Bangalore45Chennai37Hyderabad35Kolkata17Jaipur15Cochin13Lucknow11Ahmedabad9Pune7Karnataka6Indore5Guwahati3Amritsar3Telangana3Varanasi2Panaji1Ranchi1Cuttack1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Addition to Income5Unexplained Investment4Section 150(1)2

DCIT, 3(1), INDORE vs. M/S. KALANI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result appeals of the revenue & assessee are

ITA 453/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Mar 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

7 [IT(SS)A No.99/Ind/2016 and Others ] [Pankaj Kalani & Others ] the undisclosed income of the assessee? 5. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the facts that thenames appearing in the seized document were belonged to the assessee and employee of assessee and also apparent from the statement recorded

THE ACIT, 3(1), INDORE vs. M/S. KALANI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result appeals of the revenue & assessee are

ITA 452/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

7 [IT(SS)A No.99/Ind/2016 and Others ] [Pankaj Kalani & Others ] the undisclosed income of the assessee? 5. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the facts that thenames appearing in the seized document were belonged to the assessee and employee of assessee and also apparent from the statement recorded

DCIT, 3(1), INDORE vs. M/S. KALANI INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., INDORE

In the result appeals of the revenue & assessee are

ITA 451/IND/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Mar 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

7 [IT(SS)A No.99/Ind/2016 and Others ] [Pankaj Kalani & Others ] the undisclosed income of the assessee? 5. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the facts that thenames appearing in the seized document were belonged to the assessee and employee of assessee and also apparent from the statement recorded

THE DCIT 1(1), INDORE vs. M/S FLEXITUFF INTERNATIONAL LTD., INDORE

In the result appeals of the revenue & assessee are

ITA 448/IND/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

7 [IT(SS)A No.99/Ind/2016 and Others ] [Pankaj Kalani & Others ] the undisclosed income of the assessee? 5. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the facts that thenames appearing in the seized document were belonged to the assessee and employee of assessee and also apparent from the statement recorded

SHRI NARAYAN DAS TOLANI,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO 3(1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee on this ground is allowed

ITA 834/IND/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C. M. Garg & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 133ASection 142ASection 143(3)Section 150(1)

10A to assessee for relevant year and also directed Assessing Officer to take remedial action for withdrawal of claim for subsequent assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12 - Assessee claimed that direction pertaining to assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12, years which were not subject matter of appeal were without jurisdiction - Whether directions contained in impugned order pertaining