BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai252Kolkata72Jaipur69Delhi60Ahmedabad57Guwahati24Pune21Bangalore18Surat18Rajkot15Chennai13Lucknow12Chandigarh11Indore9Raipur8Patna6Visakhapatnam5Amritsar4Hyderabad3Ranchi2Cuttack1Nagpur1Calcutta1Gauhati1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 26314Section 14813Section 1479Addition to Income8Section 687Section 1516Section 69C4Penny Stock4Section 2533

SANTOSH RATHORE,INDORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE - 1, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 451/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2025AY 2015-16
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 263

penny stock by M/s Indian\nInfotech and Software Limited during the financial year 2012-13 for Rs.\n32,79,066/- which is not correct. The Ld.AR submit that the assessee has\nearned long term capital from sale of two companies namely M/s Indian\nInfotech and Software Limited Rs.18,91,815/- and Oasis Cine\nCommunication Ltd. Rs.13,87,251/. He further

SEEMA LUNAWAT,RATLAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, MANDSAUR

Appeal is allowed

Section 2503
Reassessment3
Bogus/Accommodation Entry2
ITA 300/IND/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
Section 139Section 147Section 148

reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 148 of the Act may kindly\nbe quashed for failure to comply with statutory and procedural requirements.\nThe reopening and issuance of notice under Section 148 being against the law\nmay kindly be declared null and void.\nThe addition so made towards the alleged penny stock transactions being vague,\nbaseless, and unlawful may kindly

NILIMA KOTHARI,INDORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSTT. CENTRE, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as per terms indicated above

ITA 259/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manish Boradsmt. Neelima Kothari, Income Tax Officer, 601, N.R.K. Villas, Delhi Vs. 22/2 Manoramaganj, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Adnpk7832J Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 08.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.09.2024

Section 10(38)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

147 r.w.section 144B of the Act dated 24.05.2023 treating the LTCG claimed by the assessee as bogus and made addition u/s 68 of the Act at Rs.24,46,824/-. The AO also made an addition for unexplained expenditure u/s 69C at Rs. 1,22,341/-. Income assessed at Rs.30,11,605/-. Aggrieved the assessee preferred an appeal before

SHAILESH KALWADIA (HUF),UJJAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BPL-C(91)(1), BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 464/IND/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 147Section 246ASection 250Section 253

147 rws 144B of the Act, the total income of the Assessee was computed & assessed at Rs. 19,96,350/-. The total income as per the return of income was at Rs.1,53,375/-. The addition of Rs.18,42,978/- was made as income from undisclosed sources in guise of share transaction. The tax on total income assessed was directed

SHAILESH KALWADIA (HUF) ,UJJAIN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER BPL-C-(91)(1), UJJAIN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 160/IND/2026[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 147Section 246ASection 250Section 253

147 rws 144B of the Act, the total income of the Assessee was computed & assessed at Rs. 19,96,350/-. The total income as per the return of income was at Rs.1,53,375/-. The addition of Rs.18,42,978/- was made as income from undisclosed sources in guise of share transaction. The tax on total income assessed was directed

BABITA CHELAWAT,INDORE vs. DCIT/ACIT 1(1), INDORE, INDORE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed & the impugned order is set aside

ITA 611/IND/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 253

penny stock transactions and SLP was also dismissed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the above matter. Hence, the ground of appeal is without any merit and hence the same is dismissed. 8.6 Vide Ground No. 8, the appellant has submitted that Ld. AO erred by not serving the order for rectification request made by the assessee for mistake apparent

PUMARTH CREDIT CAPITAL LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT 4 (1), INDORE, INDORE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 197/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaassessment Year: 2015-16 Pumarth Credit Capital Ltd. Acit-4(1), 28/29, Vimla Mahal, Indore 755, Peddar Road, बनाम/ Opp. Jaslok Hospital, Vs. Mumbai (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan: Aabcp8823E Assessee By Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. With Gagan Tiwari Adv. Revenue By Shri Sanjiv Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.03.2025

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 43

147 read with 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2015-16, the assessee has filed this appeal on following grounds: Page 1 of 6 Pumarth Credit Capital Ltd. ITA No.197/Ind/2024 – AY 2015-16 “1. That the impugned re-assessment notice dated 30/03/2021 for A.Y 2015- 16 is invalid and without jurisdiction as same been

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

ITA 68/IND/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 69ASection 69C

stock register. 1(d). That, without prejudice to the above, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming an addition to the extent of Rs.38,47,800/- firstly, by presuming that the appellant had effected out of books sales in respect of traded goods of a sum of Rs.2,56,52,000/- and secondly

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

ITA 67/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Dec 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

Section 145(3)Section 153ASection 68Section 69ASection 69C

stock register. 1(d). That, without prejudice to the above, the learned CIT(A) grossly erred, both on facts and in law, in confirming an addition to the extent of Rs.38,47,800/- firstly, by presuming that the appellant had effected out of books sales in respect of traded goods of a sum of Rs.2,56,52,000/- and secondly