THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

reassessment of the firm under section 143(3) read with section 148 wherein the impugned share of profit was offered to tax was completed and accepted by the Revenue. There is no material with the AO to demonstrate that firm was not genuine, and its activities were doubtful nature, and that the impugned amount of Rs.25,76,208/- represented unexplained

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

reassessment of the firm under section 143(3) read with section 148 wherein the impugned share of profit was offered to tax was completed and accepted by the Revenue. There is no material with the AO to demonstrate that firm was not genuine, and its activities were doubtful nature, and that the impugned amount of Rs.25,76,208/- represented unexplained

THE AIT,ENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SURYA INFRAVENTURE P LTD, INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

section 143(3) of the Act and there was no failure on the part of the respondent to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the Ld Assessing

THE ACIT, CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

section 143(3) of the Act and there was no failure on the part of the respondent to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the Ld Assessing

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

section 143(3) of the Act and there was no failure on the part of the respondent to disclose fully and truly all the material facts necessary for the purpose of assessment. 3. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in upholding the action of the Ld Assessing

M/S SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PVT LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

45,470/-, Rs. 4,90,583/-, Rs. 34,640/-, Rs. 4,729/- and Rs. 22,012/- respectively claimed against coaching income. 32. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that in this ground of appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of expenses of Rs 3,35,652/- for assessment year 2005-06. The assessee has shown coaching income

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1) RANGE-5, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

45,470/-, Rs. 4,90,583/-, Rs. 34,640/-, Rs. 4,729/- and Rs. 22,012/- respectively claimed against coaching income. 32. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that in this ground of appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of expenses of Rs 3,35,652/- for assessment year 2005-06. The assessee has shown coaching income

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

45,470/-, Rs. 4,90,583/-, Rs. 34,640/-, Rs. 4,729/- and Rs. 22,012/- respectively claimed against coaching income. 32. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that in this ground of appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of expenses of Rs 3,35,652/- for assessment year 2005-06. The assessee has shown coaching income

M/S. SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICES P. LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

45,470/-, Rs. 4,90,583/-, Rs. 34,640/-, Rs. 4,729/- and Rs. 22,012/- respectively claimed against coaching income. 32. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that in this ground of appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of expenses of Rs 3,35,652/- for assessment year 2005-06. The assessee has shown coaching income

M/S SHEETU EDUCATIONAL SERVICE PVT LTD.,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 5(1), INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee for assessment year 2005-06 to 2010-11 are partly allowed as per our

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

45,470/-, Rs. 4,90,583/-, Rs. 34,640/-, Rs. 4,729/- and Rs. 22,012/- respectively claimed against coaching income. 32. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that in this ground of appeal, the assessee has challenged the disallowance of expenses of Rs 3,35,652/- for assessment year 2005-06. The assessee has shown coaching income

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

45,492.00 2005-06 1,01,42,024.52 ITA 280 of 2014 and ITA 692 of 2013 6 MP Madhyam In view of the above facts, the Assessing Officer held that the nature of activities carried out by the assessee can at best be termed as commercial in nature. Therefore, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee was not covered

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

45,492.00 2005-06 1,01,42,024.52 ITA 280 of 2014 and ITA 692 of 2013 6 MP Madhyam In view of the above facts, the Assessing Officer held that the nature of activities carried out by the assessee can at best be termed as commercial in nature. Therefore, the Assessing Officer held that the assessee was not covered

MS MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD,BHOPAL vs. ACIT 2 (1) BHOPAL, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 1, BHOPAL , BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment

MS MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD,BHOPAL vs. ACIT 2 (1) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment

MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD ,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT -2- (1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 5(1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT LTD, BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -5(1), BHOPAL , BHOPAL, MADHYA PRADESH vs. MAPAEX REMEDIES PVT. LTD., BHOPAL MADHYA PRADESH

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

reassessment now sought to be done was merely a change in opinion. 15. However, the AO turned down objections of assessee through letter dated 05.11.2019, copy at Page 26A-26C of Paper-Book. Ld. AR submitted in this letter, the AO has basically mentioned that the case had been re- opened on the basis of subsequent scrutiny-assessment