SANDEEP KUMAR YADAV,BETUL vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHO
The appeal of the appellant is dismissed for statistical purpose
ITA 501/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Apr 2025AY 2013-14
Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Paresh M Joshisandeep Kumar Yadav, Nfac, बना Palsyapalsya, Delhi म/ Palsya, Vs. The. Bhainsdehi, Betul (Pan: Afnpy3295D) (Appellant) (Revenue) Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 21.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29.04.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 271(1)(b)
reassessment proceedings initiated in his case. It was only when the notice of Penalty was received that he got to know about the closed assessment proceedings u/s 147 read with section 144 of the income tax act, 1961. The appeal is preferred along with the appeal for the penalty proceedings, and this shows that the appellant was unaware
