MANOJ KUMAR GANGADHARAN,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT AND TP) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

reassessment under sub-section (3) of section 143, has been paid within the period specified in such notice of demand; and no appeal against the outer referred to in clause (a) hits , sir the assessee is a normal salaried assessee and deriving the salary from the rendering his services for merchant navy. Most of the time the assessee used

MANOJ KUMAR GANGADHARAN,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT AND TP) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee is dismissed

reassessment under sub-section (3) of section 143, has been\npaid within the period specified in such notice of demand; and no\nappeal against the outer referred to in clause (a) hits sir the\nassessee is a normal salaried assessee and deriving the salary\nfrom the rendering his services for merchant navy. Most of the\ntime the assessee used

RNG CONSTRUCTION CO,MANDIDEEP vs. ADDL.,JT.,DY.,ASSTT.ITO, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed

158, totalling Rs.10,62,939/-, thereby violating the provisions of section\n43B of the IT Act, 1961. Since this sum of Rs.10,62,939 had escaped\nassessment within the meaning of section 147, a notice u/s 148 was issued\nby the Assessing Officer on 20.03.2020 recording the following reasons:\n\"From the records, it was observed that as per column

JCIT OSD CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL vs. M/S SHAKSHI TOWN SHIP P LTD, GWALIOR

Appeal is dismissed and assessee's cross-\nobjection is allowed

reassessment proceedings and obliged\n\nKindly find the same in order and do the need full.\n\nIf any other information/documents required please inform us we shall comply the same\n\nThanking You\n\nYours faithfully\n\nFor Shakshi Township Pvt. Ltd\n\nNou s Afarand\n(Director)\n\nPage 31 of 52\n\nM/s. Shakshi Township P. Ltd.\nITA

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

158 Pvt. Ltd. 50,00,000 28,50,000 7,85,000 10. Amber Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. AVPL 3,403 - 86,066 - 23,00,000 2,29,998 11. Auckland Trading Pvt. ATPL - - Ltd. - 30,00,000 1,22,131 2,99,999 12. Avishkar Dealers Pvt. Ltd. ADPL 89,999 - 32,787 - 10,00,000 99,998 13. Bandana

DCIT , CENTRAL -2 , INDORE vs. M/S GREAT GALLEON VENTURES LTD , INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue bearing ITANo

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad

158 Pvt. Ltd. 50,00,000 28,50,000 7,85,000 10. Amber Vyapaar Pvt. Ltd. AVPL 3,403 - 86,066 - 23,00,000 2,29,998 11. Auckland Trading Pvt. ATPL - - Ltd. - 30,00,000 1,22,131 2,99,999 12. Avishkar Dealers Pvt. Ltd. ADPL 89,999 - 32,787 - 10,00,000 99,998 13. Bandana

PIYUSH JUNEJA,KHANDWA vs. JCIT RANGE-4 INDORE, INDORE

In the result, the appeal if the assessee is allowed in terms as

Bench: Shri Manish Boradassessment Year : 2015-16 Shri Piyush Juneja, Jt.Commissioner 10,Anand Nagar, Of Income-Tax, बनाम/ Khandwa Range 4, Vs. Indore. (Assessee / Appellant) (Revenue / Respondent) Pan : Aolpj9133N Assessee By Shri Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 30.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 01.08.2024

reassessment proceedings have also been challenged separately by the assessee before Ld. CIT(A), but the same is still pending for adjudication before the Ld. CIT(A). However, against the penalty order u/s 271E of the Act, the appeal to Ld. CIT(A) has been decided against the assessee. In the appeal against the levy of penalty u/s 271E

ACIT CENTRAL-2 , BHOPAL vs. M/S BALAJI FARMS AND REALITY , BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed and assessee’s cross-

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit (Central)-2, M/S.Balaji Farms & बनाम/ Bhopal Reality, Vs. 158,3Rd Floor, Zone-Ii, M.P.Nagar, Bhopal (Pan:Aalfb9630L) (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent)

158,3rd Floor, Zone-II, M.P.Nagar, Bhopal (PAN:AALFB9630L) (Assessee/Cross-Objector) (Revenue/Respondent) Assessee by Ms.Nisha Lahoti and Shri Vijay Bansal, ARs Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 12.03.2024 Date of Pronouncement 22.03.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.: Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 21.03.2022 passed by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal

THE ACIT CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL vs. SMT MEENAKSHI SARAIYA, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue and CO are dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniacit (Central)- Smt. Meenakshi Saraiya Bhopal E-13/111, Arera Colony Vs. Bhopal (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent/ Assessee) Pan: Anrps3407K Revenue By Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, Ars Assessee By Shri Ila Parmar, Cit- Dr

section 56(2)(vii) of the Act. Therefore, the statement given by the appellant that she received the said plot from the second party, is not in accordance with the documentary evidences placed on record. Hence, statement of appellant, as relied and made one of the Page 11 of 24 ITANo.231/Ind/2023 & CO No.02/Ind/2024 Meenakshi Saraiya basis of addition