BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi83Chennai78Mumbai38Jaipur32Hyderabad30Ahmedabad28Bangalore26Surat21Agra16Patna13Jodhpur11Rajkot11Visakhapatnam9Raipur9Chandigarh7Amritsar7Pune7Indore6Lucknow6Cochin6Kolkata6Cuttack2Dehradun2Nagpur2Guwahati1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 14710Section 2636Section 1486Demonetization5Section 143(3)4Section 143(2)4Section 1444Addition to Income4Section 69A3Cash Deposit

S GANDHI JEWELLERY PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. PCIT-1, INDORE, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 311/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaassessment Year: 2017-18 S. Gandhi Jewellery Pcit-1, Private Limited, Indore C/O Adv. Hitesh Chimnani, बनाम/ Ug-37 Trade Centre, Vs. 18, South Tukoganj, Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aamcs1613G Assessee By Shri Hitesh Chimnani, Ar Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 10.02.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 21.02.2025

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

demonetization period by way of issue letters for SBN deposits, secondly in the regular assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) and lastly under reassessment

DCIT-3(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. MANIDHARI JEWELLERS, BHOPAL

The appeal are allowed

3
Reassessment3
Section 1512
ITA 533/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 May 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshidcit-3(1), Manidhari Jewellers, बनाम/ Bhopal Room No.202, Vs. Metro Walk Bulding, Bitten Market, Arera Colony, Bhopal (Pan: Abafm6546L) (Revenue) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Yashwant Sharma, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 01.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 09.05.2025 आदेश/ O R D E R

Section 04Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 24Section 25Section 250Section 253

demonetization period only i.e. from 11.11.2016 to 09.12.2016. The total transaction of the assessee with M/s R. B. Enterprises is Rs.2,34,50,000/-. Further Shri Ankit Soni, Prop of M/s R. B. Enterprises in his statement during survey proceedings has admitted that there are bogus transactions which he has highlighted in his statement and surrendered undisclosed income of Rs.87.85

MANDA DUBEY,HOSHANGABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ITRASI, ITRASI

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 228/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manish Boradmanda Dubey, Ito, Ganeshganj

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 69A

reassessment proceeding void-ab-initio being without jurisdiction. 4. That learned NFAC was not justified in upholding the order of the Ld. AO in view of the fact that the order passed u/s 144 r/w section 147 was illegal, void, in breach of principle of natural justice. 5. That the NFAC erred in framing an ex- parte order in violation

SMT. SUDHA MODI,BHOPAL vs. PCIT-1, BHOPAL

ITA 86/IND/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyanivs. Smt. Sudha Modi, The Pcit-1 Nishant Colony 74 Bhopal Bunglows, Bhopal (M.P.) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Ahwpm1842P (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Gagan Tiwari, Advocate Assessee By : Shri P. K. Mishra, Cit.D.R. 21.12.2022 & 21.03.2023 Date Of Hearing 29.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement O R D E R Per Ms. Madhumita Roy - Jm: The Instant Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 25.02.2022 Passed By The Pcit-1, Bhopal (M.P.) (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Pcit)’) Under Section 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Arising Out Of The Order Dated 29.11.2019 Passed By The Dcit/Acit-5(1), Bhopal (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Ao’) Under Section 143(3) Of The Act For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2 Smt. Sudha Modi Vs. Pcit (A.Y. 2017-18) 2. We Have Heard The Rival Submissions Made By The Respective Parties & We Have Also Perused The Relevant Materials Available On Record.

For Appellant: Shri P. K. Mishra, CIT.D.RFor Respondent: Shri Gagan Tiwari, Advocate
Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

demonetization. Specific queries were issued on 18.01.2019 and 03.04.2019 requiring the assessee to furnish the details of cash deposit and the source thereon. In response to the same, the assessee duly submitted all details. After being satisfied on perusal of the details, evidences including e-submissions filed by the assessee on 17.05.2019, the Ld. AO accepted the returned income

RASHIDA BEE,JAORA CHOUPATI vs. CIT(A), RATLAM

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 916/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Indore22 Aug 2025AY 2017-18
Section 139Section 144Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 69A

demonetization from 09.11.2016 to 30.12.2016. The assessee\nhad deposited cash of Rs.15 lakhs in his Axis Bank Ltd account\nat Jaora in M.P. The bank reported to the department that total\ndeposit is of Rs.16 lakh. The amount of Rs.16 lakh was treated\nu/s 69A r.w.s.115BBE of the Act.\n2.2 That the assessee being aggrieved by the aforesaid\n\"Impugned

ARCPL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4(1), INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 731/IND/2024[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jul 2025AY 2017-2018
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 156Section 156A(1)Section 5

demonetization period and finding that the assessee-\ncompany did not file any return u/s 139(1) for AY 2017-18 under\nconsideration, initially issued notice dated 11.12.2017 u/s 142(1) calling\nreturn of income from assessee but the assessee did not respond to such\nnotice. Ultimately, the AO issued notice u/s 148 on 06.06.2018 taking case\nof assessee