THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2014-15 and Cross Objection No.18/Ind/2019 has been raised by the assessee against the above appeal. Kapil Jain ITA Nos.694,695, 696/Ind/2018 & C.O.Nos.16 to 18/Ind/19 3. As the issues raised in these appeals are common these were heard together and therefore are being disposed off by this common order for sake of convenience

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHOPAL vs. MADHYA PRADESH RAJYA SAHAKARI ANUSUCHIT JATI VITT EVAM VIKAS NIGAM, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

section 80P of the IT Act, 1961 and\nallowing the appeal of the assessee, thereby deleting the penalty u/s\n271(1)(c) of Rs.1,75,00,000/-, when inaccurate particulars of income are\nclearly apparent from the return of income filed and the submissions of the\nassessee during the penalty proceedings?\"\n2. The background facts leading to present appeal

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present