BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi39Mumbai30Bangalore26Cochin21Amritsar18Pune16Ahmedabad16Jaipur12Visakhapatnam11Surat9Chandigarh9Indore8Rajkot6Varanasi6Lucknow5Chennai5Nagpur4Kolkata3Jodhpur2Patna1Telangana1Guwahati1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 80P13Section 115J9Section 271(1)(c)8Deduction8Disallowance8Section 1546Section 143(3)6Section 1435Section 1475

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 696/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2014-15 and Cross Objection No.18/Ind/2019 has been raised by the assessee against the above appeal. Kapil Jain ITA Nos.694,695, 696/Ind/2018 & C.O.Nos.16 to 18/Ind/19 3. As the issues raised in these appeals are common these were heard together and therefore are being disposed off by this common order for sake of convenience

Penalty5
Addition to Income5
Section 80H3

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 695/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2014-15 and Cross Objection No.18/Ind/2019 has been raised by the assessee against the above appeal. Kapil Jain ITA Nos.694,695, 696/Ind/2018 & C.O.Nos.16 to 18/Ind/19 3. As the issues raised in these appeals are common these were heard together and therefore are being disposed off by this common order for sake of convenience

THE ACIT , RATLAM vs. SHRI KAPIL JAIN, RATLAM

In the result appeal of the revenue No

ITA 694/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 10ASection 115JSection 143(3)Section 154Section 271(1)(c)Section 80HSection 80P

271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2014-15 and Cross Objection No.18/Ind/2019 has been raised by the assessee against the above appeal. Kapil Jain ITA Nos.694,695, 696/Ind/2018 & C.O.Nos.16 to 18/Ind/19 3. As the issues raised in these appeals are common these were heard together and therefore are being disposed off by this common order for sake of convenience

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

ITA 93/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

ITA 95/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 May 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

ITA 96/IND/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 May 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

ITA 92/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present

INDORE MANDAL DAK TAR KARAMCHARI SAHAKARI SANSTHA MY. INDORE,INDORE vs. THE ADDITIONAL CIT , INDORE

ITA 94/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore15 May 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 143Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 80P

80P in respect of the interest income earned by the assessee from the scheduled bank. He has submitted that the CIT(A) has confirmed the disallowance by following the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Totagars Co-operative Sale Society versus IT0 188 Taxmann 282. The said decision is not applicable in the facts of the present