ROHIT GOYAL,MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3), INDORE, INDORE
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 329/IND/2023[2013-2014]Status: HeardITAT Indore07 Aug 2024AY 2013-2014
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanirohit Goyal Ito, Ward 5(3) A 2904, Oberoi Woods, Mohan Indore Gokhale Road, Goregaon East Vs. Maharashtra (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Akupg2685D Assessee By Shri Pankaj Shah & Shri Soumya Bumb, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 05.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 07.08.2024
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 234Section 271FSection 282A
penalty proceeding u/s 271F,
271(1)(b) and 271(1)(c) of the acts.
9. The Appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, delete all or any of the grounds of appeal on or before of hearing.”
2. The ld. AR of the assesse has submitted that the notices issued by the AO u/s 148 of the Act is invalid
