Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 234Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai85 Delhi33 Karnataka25 Bangalore16 Kolkata12 Visakhapatnam7 Mumbai6 Pune3 Nagpur2 Hyderabad1 Indore1 Rajkot1 Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)4

M/S. M. LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM vs. THE ITO-1, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 185/IND/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. No. 185/Ind/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/S.M.Lodha Impex, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, 117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam.

For Appellant: Shri Satiksh Solanki, DRFor Respondent: 29.05.2018

Section 119(1)(b)Section 119(2)(b)Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234A

u/s 143(2) after expiry of normal limitation period. Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, reads as under :- “[Instructions to subordinate authorities. 119. (1) The Board may, from time to time, issue such orders, instructions and directions to other income-tax authorities as it may deem fit for the proper administration of this Act, and such authorities