BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

63 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi375Mumbai211Karnataka99Jaipur97Indore63Bangalore61Chennai60Ahmedabad50Raipur35Pune29Kolkata23Hyderabad23Allahabad19Rajkot17Chandigarh14Lucknow13Cochin10Visakhapatnam7Cuttack7Dehradun7Ranchi3Nagpur3Agra2Guwahati2SC2Surat2Jodhpur1Telangana1Rajasthan1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(b)138Section 142(1)94Penalty55Section 13252Section 14446Section 271(1)(c)19Addition to Income13Section 153A10Section 271D

VIMAL TODI,INDORE vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INDORE

Appeal is allowed

ITA 188/IND/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshishri Vimal Todi, Additional Commissioner बनाम/ 501, Darshan Residency, Of Income-Tax, Vs. 104-105, Anand Bazar, Indore Indore

Section 132Section 254(2)Section 271DSection 275Section 275(1)(c)

220 ITR 226 (Raj.) has considered the aspect of initiation of penalty proceedings as under:- "We have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the Revenue. Section 274 of the Income-tax Act provides the procedure for imposing the penalty while section 275 sets out the time-limit within which the penalty proceedings must be completed. Section 275 requires

Showing 1–20 of 63 · Page 1 of 4

8
Section 143(3)7
Unexplained Investment6
Disallowance5

M/S. STI (INDIA) LTD.,INDORE vs. THE ACIT-5(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 42/IND/2017[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Dec 2018AY 2005-06
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

220/-. The penalty so levied being illegal and wrong, the same require to be deleted. 4. That the Ld. CIT(A) erred in maintaining penalty on prior period expenses of Rs.3,91,610/-. That no penalty can be levied on disallowance of prior period expenses. The penalty so levied being illegal and wrong, the same require to be deleted.” 2

SUNIT MADHOK,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, , BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 344/IND/2018[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

M/S REGENT BEERS AND WINES LTD. ,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 348/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

M/S REGENT BEERS AND WINES LTD. ,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 349/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 353/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 355/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

SH. RAMSWAROOP SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL- 1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 389/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 356/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 375/IND/2018[10-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 376/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 377/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 378/IND/2018[13-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 379/IND/2018[14-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

VAISHALI SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 380/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

PATEL EDUCATION AND WELFARE SOCIETY,INDORE vs. DCIT (CENTRAL)- !, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 354/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

SH. RAMSWAROOP SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL- 1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 390/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

SH. RAMSWAROOP SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL- 1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 393/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

SH. RAMSWAROOP SHIVHARE,GWALIOR vs. D.C.I.T., CENTRAL- 1, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 394/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338

M/S REGENT BEERS AND WINES LTD. ,INDORE vs. DCIT,CENTRAL-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of the assessee(s) in ITANo

ITA 346/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(b)

2. As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together and are being disposed off by this common order for the sake of convenience and brevity. 3. It is agreed by both the parties that facts involved in all these appeals are common and the common issue relates to the levy of ITANo.338